These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23493206)

  • 1. Nonfocal renal biopsies: adequacy and factors affecting a successful outcome.
    Goldstein MA; Atri M; O'Malley M; Jacks L; John R; Herzenberg A; Reich H; Ghai S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 23493206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adequacy and complication rates with 14- vs. 16-gauge automated needles in percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys.
    Chunduri S; Whittier WL; Korbet SM
    Semin Dial; 2015; 28(2):E11-4. PubMed ID: 25441680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percutaneous US-guided renal biopsy: a retrospective study comparing the 16-gauge end-cut and 14-gauge side-notch needles.
    Constantin A; Brisson ML; Kwan J; Proulx F
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 20133155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sixteen Gauge biopsy needles are better and safer than 18 Gauge in native and transplant kidney biopsies.
    Peters B; Mölne J; Hadimeri H; Hadimeri U; Stegmayr B
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27055922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Number of needle passes does not correlate with the diagnostic yield of renal fine needle aspiration cytology.
    Andonian S; Okeke Z; Okeke DA; Sugrue C; Wasserman PG; Lee BR
    J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2377-80. PubMed ID: 18937600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is bigger better? A retrospective analysis of native renal biopsies with 16 Gauge versus 18 Gauge automatic needles.
    Mai J; Yong J; Dixson H; Makris A; Aravindan A; Suranyi MG; Wong J
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2013 Jul; 18(7):525-30. PubMed ID: 23639213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Focal hepatic lesions: US-guided biopsy--lessons from review of cytologic and pathologic examination results.
    Appelbaum L; Kane RA; Kruskal JB; Romero J; Sosna J
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 19164697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys: a single-center experience of 1,055 biopsies.
    Korbet SM; Volpini KC; Whittier WL
    Am J Nephrol; 2014; 39(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 24526094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of ultrasound and cystoscopically guided pancreatic allograft biopsies and transabdominal renal allograft biopsies: safety and efficacy in kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.
    Kuhr CS; Davis CL; Barr D; McVicar JP; Perkins JD; Bachi CE; Alpers CE; Marsh CL
    J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 7815571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT-guided Native Medical Renal Biopsy: Cortical Tangential versus Non-Tangential Approaches-A Comparison of Efficacy and Safety.
    Liu B; O'Dell M; Flores M; Limback J; Kendall M; Pepe J; Burt JR; Contreras F; Lewis AR; Ward TJ
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):293-299. PubMed ID: 27875104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness and safety of two 18-gauge needle types on native and allograft renal biopsies.
    Cassol CA; Braga JR; Dabbo S; Khalili K; Avila-Casado C
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2017 Jun; 28():1-6. PubMed ID: 28648933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of clinical complications and risk factors in 1,001 native and transplant kidney biopsies in Sweden.
    Peters B; Andersson Y; Stegmayr B; Mölne J; Jensen G; Dahlberg P; Holm-Gunnarsson I; Ekberg J; Bjurström K; Haux SB; Hadimeri H
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Sep; 55(7):890-6. PubMed ID: 24068748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors Contributing to the Success of Ultrasound-Guided Native Renal Biopsy.
    Kriegshauser JS; Patel MD; Young SW; Chen F; Eversman WG; Chang YH; Smith M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Feb; 35(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 26782168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining the Optimal Number of Core Needle Biopsy Passes for Molecular Diagnostics.
    Hoang NS; Ge BH; Pan LY; Ozawa MG; Kong CS; Louie JD; Shah RP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 29279975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transjugular renal biopsy: our experience and technical considerations.
    See TC; Thompson BC; Howie AJ; Karamshi M; Papadopoulou AM; Davies N; Tibballs J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(5):906-18. PubMed ID: 18266029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associations of patient characteristics, disease stage, and biopsy technique with the diagnostic quality of core needle renal biopsy specimens from dogs with suspected kidney disease.
    Crivellenti LZ; Cianciolo R; Wittum T; Lees GE; Adin CA
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 252(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 29244598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective analysis of complication and adequacy rates of ultrasound-guided native and transplant non-focal renal biopsies.
    Ferguson C; Winters S; Jackson S; McToal M; Low G
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Aug; 43(8):2183-2189. PubMed ID: 29159524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications and adequacy of transplant kidney biopsies: A comparison of techniques.
    Plattner BW; Chen P; Cross R; Leavitt MA; Killen PD; Heung M
    J Vasc Access; 2018 May; 19(3):291-296. PubMed ID: 29544384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. US-guided renal transplant biopsy: efficacy of a cortical tangential approach.
    Patel MD; Phillips CJ; Young SW; Kriegshauser JS; Chen F; Eversman WG; Silva AC; Lorans R
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):290-6. PubMed ID: 20574102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of needle gauge and lobe laterality on parenchymal liver biopsy outcome: a retrospective analysis.
    Vijayaraghavan GR; Vedantham S; Rangan V; Karam A; Zheng L; Roychowdhury A; Hussain S
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jun; 40(5):1223-9. PubMed ID: 25367814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.