These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23493385)

  • 21. Demographic characteristics of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor.
    Kanavakis G; Dombroski MM; Malouf DP; Athanasiou AE
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 25788332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in pediatric surgery.
    Salim A; Mullassery D; Losty PD
    J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Nov; 52(11):1732-1735. PubMed ID: 28830620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment for Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Field of Hepatology.
    Kim G; Cho YZ; Baik SK
    Gut Liver; 2015 Nov; 9(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 26503570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention.
    Storman D; Koperny M; Zając J; Polak M; Weglarz P; Bochenek-Cibor J; Swierz MJ; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach AA; Kaluzinska K; Bała MM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading gastroenterology and hepatology journals: A systematic review.
    Liu P; Qiu Y; Qian Y; Chen X; Wang Y; Cui J; Zhai X
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27600190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
    Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals from 1997 to 2017.
    Natto ZS; AlGhamdi DS
    Saudi Med J; 2019 May; 40(5):426-431. PubMed ID: 31056617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The methodological quality of robotic surgical meta-analyses needed to be improved: a cross-sectional study.
    Yan P; Yao L; Li H; Zhang M; Xun Y; Li M; Cai H; Lu C; Hu L; Guo T; Liu R; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():20-29. PubMed ID: 30579979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Replicate systematic review and meta-analyses on robotic surgery: a quality appraisal and overlap investigation.
    Ji J; Zhang H; Xu D; Zhang T; Kong D; Xiao G; Cao Z; Wang F; Gao X; Sun YH
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):384-395. PubMed ID: 30972621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A systematic evaluation of methodological and reporting quality of meta-analysis published in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy.
    Xia H; Peng S; Huang S; Jiang J; Zeng X; Zhang H; Pu X; Zou K; Lü Y; Xu H; Peng Y; Lü M; Tang X
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):807-816. PubMed ID: 36050611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics.
    Papageorgiou SN; Xavier GM; Cobourne MT; Eliades T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 100():44-52. PubMed ID: 29705094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methodological quality of meta-analyses of single-case experimental studies.
    Jamshidi L; Heyvaert M; Declercq L; Fernández-Castilla B; Ferron JM; Moeyaert M; Beretvas SN; Onghena P; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():97-115. PubMed ID: 29289406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality.
    Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity.
    Nissen T; Wayant C; Wahlstrom A; Sinnett P; Fugate C; Herrington J; Vassar M
    Clin Obes; 2017 Feb; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 28112500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.