These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23493417)

  • 1. The DNA damage checkpoint response to replication stress: A Game of Forks.
    Jossen R; Bermejo R
    Front Genet; 2013; 4():26. PubMed ID: 23493417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork.
    Segurado M; Tercero JA
    Biol Cell; 2009 Aug; 101(11):617-27. PubMed ID: 19686094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Intra-S Checkpoint Responses to DNA Damage.
    Iyer DR; Rhind N
    Genes (Basel); 2017 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 28218681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recovery from the DNA Replication Checkpoint.
    Chaudhury I; Koepp DM
    Genes (Basel); 2016 Oct; 7(11):. PubMed ID: 27801838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. S-phase checkpoint regulations that preserve replication and chromosome integrity upon dNTP depletion.
    Giannattasio M; Branzei D
    Cell Mol Life Sci; 2017 Jul; 74(13):2361-2380. PubMed ID: 28220209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Requirement of replication checkpoint protein kinases Mec1/Rad53 for postreplication repair in yeast.
    Gangavarapu V; Santa Maria SR; Prakash S; Prakash L
    mBio; 2011; 2(3):e00079-11. PubMed ID: 21586645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cohesin Ubiquitylation and Mobilization Facilitate Stalled Replication Fork Dynamics.
    Frattini C; Villa-Hernández S; Pellicanò G; Jossen R; Katou Y; Shirahige K; Bermejo R
    Mol Cell; 2017 Nov; 68(4):758-772.e4. PubMed ID: 29129641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Signaling pathways of replication stress in yeast.
    Pardo B; Crabbé L; Pasero P
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2017 Mar; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 27915243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.
    Patel DR; Weiss RS
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2018 Dec; 46(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 30514768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separation of intra-S checkpoint protein contributions to DNA replication fork protection and genomic stability in normal human fibroblasts.
    Smith-Roe SL; Patel SS; Zhou Y; Simpson DA; Rao S; Ibrahim JG; Cordeiro-Stone M; Kaufmann WK
    Cell Cycle; 2013 Jan; 12(2):332-45. PubMed ID: 23255133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preserving replication fork integrity and competence via the homologous recombination pathway.
    Ait Saada A; Lambert SAE; Carr AM
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2018 Nov; 71():135-147. PubMed ID: 30220600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair.
    Friedel AM; Pike BL; Gasser SM
    Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19230642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The checkpoint response to replication stress.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2009 Sep; 8(9):1038-46. PubMed ID: 19482564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks.
    Segurado M; Diffley JF
    Genes Dev; 2008 Jul; 22(13):1816-27. PubMed ID: 18593882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity.
    Cortez D
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2015 Aug; 32():149-157. PubMed ID: 25957489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orchestration of the S-phase and DNA damage checkpoint pathways by replication forks from early origins.
    Caldwell JM; Chen Y; Schollaert KL; Theis JF; Babcock GF; Newlon CS; Sanchez Y
    J Cell Biol; 2008 Mar; 180(6):1073-86. PubMed ID: 18347065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Degradation of Mrc1 promotes recombination-mediated restart of stalled replication forks.
    Chaudhury I; Koepp DM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Mar; 45(5):2558-2570. PubMed ID: 27956499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mec1/ATR, the Program Manager of Nucleic Acids Inc.
    Feng W
    Genes (Basel); 2016 Dec; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 28036033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assembly of Slx4 signaling complexes behind DNA replication forks.
    Balint A; Kim T; Gallo D; Cussiol JR; Bastos de Oliveira FM; Yimit A; Ou J; Nakato R; Gurevich A; Shirahige K; Smolka MB; Zhang Z; Brown GW
    EMBO J; 2015 Aug; 34(16):2182-97. PubMed ID: 26113155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replication fork stalling by bulky DNA damage: localization at active origins and checkpoint modulation.
    Minca EC; Kowalski D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Apr; 39(7):2610-23. PubMed ID: 21138968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.