227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23493989)
1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China: an overview.
Zhu C; Jin K
Onco Targets Ther; 2013; 6():119-24. PubMed ID: 23493989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in China: an overview.
Lan H; Zhu N; Lan Y; Jin K; Teng L
Hepatogastroenterology; 2015; 62(137):234-9. PubMed ID: 25911902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.
Jin K; Wang J; Lan H; Zhang R
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2014; 7(12):4635-45. PubMed ID: 25663960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.
Watanabe M; Baba Y; Nagai Y; Baba H
Surg Today; 2013 Mar; 43(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 22926551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.
Takeuchi H; Kawakubo H; Kitagawa Y
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 61(9):513-21. PubMed ID: 23661109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
Verhage RJ; Hazebroek EJ; Boone J; Van Hillegersberg R
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 19365314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Chinese experiences.
Lin M; Shen Y; Feng M; Tan L
J Vis Surg; 2016; 2():134. PubMed ID: 29078521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent advances in minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous esophageal cancer.
Yip HC; Shirakawa Y; Cheng CY; Huang CL; Chiu PWY
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2020 Dec; 1482(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 32783237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an overview.
Smithers BM
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Feb; 4(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 20136592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Advancement of minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Zhao Y; Mao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 21(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 29354905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.
Lee JM; Cheng JW; Lin MT; Huang PM; Chen JS; Lee YC
World J Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 21327605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Halpern AL; Friedman C; Torphy RJ; Al-Musawi MH; Mitchell JD; Scott CD; Meguid RA; McCarter MD; Weyant MJ; Gleisner AL
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3470-3478. PubMed ID: 31591657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
