These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23494872)

  • 1. Adaptive designs for noninferiority trials.
    Gao P; Liu L; Mehta C
    Biom J; 2013 May; 55(3):310-21. PubMed ID: 23494872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact inference for adaptive group sequential designs.
    Gao P; Liu L; Mehta C
    Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(23):3991-4005. PubMed ID: 23686358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exact confidence bounds following adaptive group sequential tests.
    Brannath W; Mehta CR; Posch M
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 18759843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
    Cheng Y; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data-driven analysis strategies for proportion studies in adaptive group sequential test designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):585-603. PubMed ID: 14584710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
    Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeated confidence intervals for adaptive group sequential trials.
    Mehta CR; Bauer P; Posch M; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5422-33. PubMed ID: 17918195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size re-estimation for survival data in clinical trials with an adaptive design.
    Togo K; Iwasaki M
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 22328325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive design in clinical research: issues, opportunities, and recommendations.
    Chang M; Chow SC; Pong A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):299-309; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 16724486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninferiority testing beyond simple two-sample comparison.
    Tsong Y; Chen WJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):289-308. PubMed ID: 17365225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
    Yin G; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-theoretic views on simultaneous testing of superiority and noninferiority.
    Koyama T; Westfall PH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 16279353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2027-40. PubMed ID: 22729929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-arm noninferiority trials with a prespecified margin for inference of the difference in the proportions of binary endpoints.
    Hida E; Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):774-89. PubMed ID: 23799810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size determination and re-estimation for matched pair designs with multiple binary endpoints.
    Xu J; Yu M
    Biom J; 2013 May; 55(3):430-43. PubMed ID: 23553605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals for confirmatory adaptive two-stage designs with treatment selection.
    Bebu I; Dragalin V; Luta G
    Biom J; 2013 May; 55(3):294-309. PubMed ID: 23553644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.