These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23496991)

  • 1. A graphical tool for locating inconsistency in network meta-analyses.
    Krahn U; Binder H; König J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():35. PubMed ID: 23496991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying inconsistency in network meta-analysis: Is the net heat plot a reliable method?
    Freeman SC; Fisher D; White IR; Auperin A; Carpenter JR
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(29):5547-5564. PubMed ID: 31647136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualizing inconsistency in network meta-analysis by independent path decomposition.
    Krahn U; Binder H; König J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():131. PubMed ID: 25510877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A matrix-based method of moments for fitting multivariate network meta-analysis models with multiple outcomes and random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Bujkiewicz S; Law M; Riley RD; White IR
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):548-556. PubMed ID: 28806485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions.
    Veroniki AA; Vasiliadis HS; Higgins JP; Salanti G
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 42(1):332-45. PubMed ID: 23508418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visualizing the flow of evidence in network meta-analysis and characterizing mixed treatment comparisons.
    König J; Krahn U; Binder H
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5414-29. PubMed ID: 24123165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study.
    Song F; Xiong T; Parekh-Bhurke S; Loke YK; Sutton AJ; Eastwood AJ; Holland R; Chen YF; Glenny AM; Deeks JJ; Altman DG
    BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4909. PubMed ID: 21846695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Veroniki AA; Law M; Tricco AC; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):416-434. PubMed ID: 28585257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Barrett JK; Rice S; White IR; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(21):3639-54. PubMed ID: 24777711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Tanaka S; Matsui S; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 27917493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A primer on network meta-analysis with emphasis on mental health.
    Mavridis D; Giannatsi M; Cipriani A; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2015 May; 18(2):40-6. PubMed ID: 25908686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies.
    Higgins JP; Jackson D; Barrett JK; Lu G; Ades AE; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Jun; 3(2):98-110. PubMed ID: 26062084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unsolved issues of mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: network size and inconsistency.
    Sturtz S; Bender R
    Res Synth Methods; 2012 Dec; 3(4):300-11. PubMed ID: 26053423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.
    Glenny AM; Altman DG; Song F; Sakarovitch C; Deeks JJ; D'Amico R; Bradburn M; Eastwood AJ;
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jul; 9(26):1-134, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to evaluating loop inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Turner RM; Band T; Morris TP; Fisher DJ; Higgins JPT; Carpenter JR; White IR
    Stat Med; 2023 Nov; 42(27):4917-4930. PubMed ID: 37767752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of evidence of inconsistency and its association with network structural characteristics in 201 published networks of interventions.
    Veroniki AA; Tsokani S; White IR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Mavridis D; Higgins JPT; Salanti G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):224. PubMed ID: 34689743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.