These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23497161)
1. Surveying alcohol and other drug use through telephone sampling: a comparison of landline and mobile phone samples. Livingston M; Dietze P; Ferris J; Pennay D; Hayes L; Lenton S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():41. PubMed ID: 23497161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia: design, methods, call outcomes, costs and sample representativeness. Barr ML; van Ritten JJ; Steel DG; Thackway SV BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Nov; 12():177. PubMed ID: 23173849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving gambling survey research using dual-frame sampling of landline and mobile phone numbers. Jackson AC; Pennay D; Dowling NA; Coles-Janess B; Christensen DR J Gambl Stud; 2014 Jun; 30(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 23288431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013. Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Taylor AW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27089889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008. Dal Grande E; Taylor AW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of the mode of survey administration on estimates of daily smoking for mobile phone only users. Hanna J; Cordery DV; Steel DG; Davis W; Harrold TC BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):65. PubMed ID: 28427334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing a weighting strategy to include mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey using an overlapping dual-frame design with limited benchmark information. Barr ML; Ferguson RA; Hughes PJ; Steel DG BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Sep; 14():102. PubMed ID: 25189826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Profiling the mobile-only population in Australia: insights from the Australian National Health Survey. Baffour B; Haynes M; Dinsdale S; Western M; Pennay D Aust N Z J Public Health; 2016 Oct; 40(5):443-447. PubMed ID: 27372061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recruitment using mobile telephones in an Irish general population sexual health survey: challenges and practical solutions. McBride O; Morgan K; McGee H BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():45. PubMed ID: 22475155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Growing cell-phone population and noncoverage bias in traditional random digit dial telephone health surveys. Lee S; Brick JM; Brown ER; Grant D Health Serv Res; 2010 Aug; 45(4):1121-39. PubMed ID: 20500221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. National estimates of Australian gambling prevalence: f indings from a dual-frame omnibus survey. Dowling NA; Youssef GJ; Jackson AC; Pennay DW; Francis KL; Pennay A; Lubman DI Addiction; 2016 Mar; 111(3):420-35. PubMed ID: 26381314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inclusion of mobile telephone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia, using an overlapping dual-frame design: impact on the time series. Barr ML; Ferguson RA; Steel DG BMC Res Notes; 2014 Aug; 7():517. PubMed ID: 25113743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Potential selection bias in telephone surveys: landline and mobile phones]. Garcia-Continente X; Pérez-Giménez A; López MJ; Nebot M Gac Sanit; 2014; 28(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 24300381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences Between Landline and Mobile Phone Users in Sexual Behavior Research. Badcock PB; Patrick K; Smith AMA; Simpson JM; Pennay D; Rissel CE; de Visser RO; Grulich AE; Richters J Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Aug; 46(6):1711-1721. PubMed ID: 27671783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys. Blumberg SJ; Luke JV Am J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 99(10):1806-10. PubMed ID: 19696381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Including mobile-only telephone users in a statewide preventive health survey-Differences in the prevalence of health risk factors and impact on trends. Baffour B; Roselli T; Haynes M; Bon JJ; Western M; Clemens S Prev Med Rep; 2017 Sep; 7():91-98. PubMed ID: 28593128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving public health surveillance using a dual-frame survey of landline and cell phone numbers. Hu SS; Balluz L; Battaglia MP; Frankel MR Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 173(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 21343246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring health behaviors and landline telephones: potential coverage bias in a low-income, rural population. Shebl F; Poppell CE; Zhan M; Dwyer DM; Hopkins AB; Groves C; Reed F; Devadason C; Steinberger EK Public Health Rep; 2009; 124(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 19618786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dual-frame sampling methodology to address landline replacement in tobacco control research. McMillen RC; Winickoff JP; Wilson K; Tanski S; Klein JD Tob Control; 2015 Jan; 24(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 23596199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Blumberg SJ; Luke JV; Cynamon ML Am J Public Health; 2006 May; 96(5):926-31. PubMed ID: 16571707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]