These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23497161)
21. Public Attitudes Toward the Police: Findings From a Dual-Frame Telephone Survey. He NP; Ren L; Zhao JS; Bills MA Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 May; 62(7):1992-2015. PubMed ID: 28201929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Increasing cell phone usage among Hispanics: implications for telephone surveys. Lee S; Elkasabi M; Streja L Am J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 102(6):e19-24. PubMed ID: 22515863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The feasibility of collecting drug abuse data by telephone. Gfroerer JC; Hughes AL Public Health Rep; 1991; 106(4):384-93. PubMed ID: 1908589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study. Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies. Voigt LF; Schwartz SM; Doody DR; Lee SC; Li CI Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 173(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 21071602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Face-to-face household interviews versus telephone interviews for health surveys. Donovan RJ; Holman CD; Corti B; Jalleh G Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 21(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9161067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Summary of the Impact of the Inclusion of Mobile Phone Numbers into the NSW Population Health Survey in 2012. Barr M; Ferguson R; van Ritten J; Hughes P; Steel D AIMS Public Health; 2015; 2(2):210-217. PubMed ID: 29546105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does mobile phone survey method matter? Reliability of computer-assisted telephone interviews and interactive voice response non-communicable diseases risk factor surveys in low and middle income countries. Pariyo GW; Greenleaf AR; Gibson DG; Ali J; Selig H; Labrique AB; Al Kibria GM; Khan IA; Masanja H; Flora MS; Ahmed S; Hyder AA PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214450. PubMed ID: 30969975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A feasibility study of cell phone and landline phone interviews for monitoring of risk and protection factors for chronic diseases in Brazil. Moura EC; Claro RM; Bernal R; Ribeiro J; Malta DC; Morais Neto O Cad Saude Publica; 2011 Feb; 27(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 21359464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A pilot study of a computer-assisted cell-phone interview (CACI) methodology to survey respondents in households without telephones about alcohol use. Wilkins C; Casswell S; Barnes HM; Pledger M Drug Alcohol Rev; 2003 Jun; 22(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 12850908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vigitel--Aracaju, Sergipe, 2008: the effects of post-stratification adjustments in correcting biases due to the small amount of households with a landline telephone. Bernal RT; Malta DC; de Morais Neto OL; Claro RM; Mendoça BC; de Oliveira AC; da Silva NN Rev Bras Epidemiol; 2014; 17(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 24896790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mobile phones are a viable option for surveying young Australian women: a comparison of two telephone survey methods. Liu B; Brotherton JM; Shellard D; Donovan B; Saville M; Kaldor JM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Nov; 11():159. PubMed ID: 22114932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Role of employment or scholar status and gender: Drug use among 18 to 25 year-olds in France in 2005]. Legleye S; Beck F; Peretti-Watel P; Chau N Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Oct; 56(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 18945566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A systematic review of publications assessing reliability and validity of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2004-2011. Pierannunzi C; Hu SS; Balluz L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():49. PubMed ID: 23522349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Moving towards a single-frame cell phone design in random digit dialing surveys: considerations from a French general population health survey. Soullier N; Legleye S; Richard JB BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):94. PubMed ID: 35369861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing for household drug use surveys. Aquilino WS Int J Addict; 1992 Jan; 27(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 1537641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of low survey response rates on estimates of alcohol consumption in a general population survey. Meiklejohn J; Connor J; Kypri K PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35527. PubMed ID: 22532858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Methodologic changes in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 2011 and potential effects on prevalence estimates. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2012 Jun; 61(22):410-3. PubMed ID: 22672976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reducing bias in telephone survey estimates of the prevalence of drug use: a randomized trial of telephone audio-CASI. Turner CF; Villarroel MA; Rogers SM; Eggleston E; Ganapathi L; Roman AM; Al-Tayyib A Addiction; 2005 Oct; 100(10):1432-44. PubMed ID: 16185205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prevalence of problematic cannabis use in Canada: Cross-sectional findings from the 2013 Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey. Leos-Toro C; Rynard V; Hammond D Can J Public Health; 2018 Jan; 108(5-6):e516-e522. PubMed ID: 29356658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]