165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23497228)
1. Empirical Bayes estimation of posterior probabilities of enrichment: a comparative study of five estimators of the local false discovery rate.
Yang Z; Li Z; Bickel DR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():87. PubMed ID: 23497228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
Padilla M; Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate.
Dalmasso C; Broët P; Moreau T
Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(5):660-8. PubMed ID: 15479710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simple estimators of false discovery rates given as few as one or two p-values without strong parametric assumptions.
Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Aug; 12(4):529-43. PubMed ID: 23798617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A constrained polynomial regression procedure for estimating the local False Discovery Rate.
Dalmasso C; Bar-Hen A; Broët P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 8():229. PubMed ID: 17603882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of estimation methods adjusting for selection bias in adaptive enrichment designs with time-to-event endpoints.
Di Stefano F; Pannaux M; Correges A; Galtier S; Robert V; Saint-Hilary G
Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(10):1767-1779. PubMed ID: 35098579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
Jiao S; Zhang S
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
Wang C
Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation.
Strimmer K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():303. PubMed ID: 18613966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of gene sets in the Gene Ontology space under the multiple hypothesis testing framework.
Zhong S; Tian L; Li C; Storch KF; Wong WH
Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2004; ():425-35. PubMed ID: 16448035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Empirical Bayes interval estimates that are conditionally equal to unadjusted confidence intervals or to default prior credibility intervals.
Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Feb; 11(3):Article 7. PubMed ID: 22499708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Empirical Bayes estimation of the selected treatment mean for two-stage drop-the-loser trials: a meta-analytic approach.
Bowden J; Brannath W; Glimm E
Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):388-400. PubMed ID: 23873666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses under sparse dependence: Adaptive FDR controlling in microarray data.
Biswas A; Chakraborty S; Baruah VJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 May; 31(5):917-927. PubMed ID: 35133933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian assignment of gene ontology terms to gene expression experiments.
Sykacek P
Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 28(18):i603-i610. PubMed ID: 22962488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
