BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23498378)

  • 1. Incapacity in Canada: review of laws and policies on research involving decisionally impaired adults.
    Wildeman S; Dunn LB; Onyemelukwe C
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2013 Apr; 21(4):314-25. PubMed ID: 23498378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of provincial and territorial legislation governing substitute consent for research.
    Bravo G; Gagnon M; Wildeman S; Marshall DT; Pâquet M; Dubois MF
    Can J Aging; 2005; 24(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 16421848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparing ethics committees from France and Quebec with respect to incapacity to consent to research].
    Bravo G; Dubois MF; Hansel S; Delpierre C; Duguet AM
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2009 Aug; 57(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 19540684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Substitute consent practices in the face of uncertainty: a survey of Canadian researchers in aging.
    Bravo G; Wildeman S; Dubois MF; Kim SY; Cohen C; Graham J; Painter K
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2013 Nov; 25(11):1821-30. PubMed ID: 23927951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research participation of individuals with dementia.
    Beattie E
    Res Gerontol Nurs; 2009 Apr; 2(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 20077970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal capacity in a health care context: an opportunity to review.
    Forrester K
    J Law Med; 2014 Jun; 21(4):789-96. PubMed ID: 25087361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: a content analysis of participant information sheets for consultees and legal representatives in England and Wales.
    Shepherd V; Wood F; Griffith R; Sheehan M; Hood K
    Trials; 2019 Apr; 20(1):233. PubMed ID: 31023383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comfort with proxy consent to research involving decisionally impaired older adults: do type of proxy and risk-benefit profile matter?
    Dubois MF; Bravo G; Graham J; Wildeman S; Cohen C; Painter K; Bellemare S
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2011 Nov; 23(9):1479-88. PubMed ID: 21429277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
    Dixon-Woods M; Angell EL
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 19482983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enrolling decisionally impaired adults in clinical research.
    Chen DT; Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
    Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9 Suppl):V20-9. PubMed ID: 12226582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical considerations in psychopharmacological research involving decisionally impaired subjects.
    Rosenstein DL; Miller FG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Dec; 171(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 12774188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
    Berger JT
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Jan; 37(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 20952491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical waves of the silver tsunami: consent, capacity, and surrogate decision-making.
    Dunn LB; Alici Y
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2013 Apr; 21(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 23498377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making decisions for incapable adults 4: participation in research.
    Griffin R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2006 Jun; 11(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 16835523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incapacity and autonomy: striking a balance.
    Winninger D; Pineau L
    Health Law Can; 1995; 15(3):59-64. PubMed ID: 10141076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An international comparison of legal frameworks for supported and substitute decision-making in mental health services.
    Davidson G; Brophy L; Campbell J; Farrell SJ; Gooding P; O'Brien AM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 44():30-40. PubMed ID: 26318975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Including People with Dementia in Research: An Analysis of Australian Ethical and Legal Rules and Recommendations for Reform.
    Ries NM; Thompson KA; Lowe M
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Sep; 14(3):359-374. PubMed ID: 28634767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuroscience research involving older persons in Canada: some legal and neuroethical concerns.
    Onyemelukwe C
    Med Law; 2013 Sep; 32(3):389-422. PubMed ID: 24340488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Healthcare professionals' understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey.
    Shepherd V; Griffith R; Sheehan M; Wood F; Hood K
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Sep; 44(9):632-637. PubMed ID: 29695407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.