280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23499143)
1. Test-retest reliability, repeatability, and sensitivity of an automated deformation-controlled indentation on pressure pain threshold measurement.
Koo TK; Guo JY; Brown CM
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Feb; 36(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 23499143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters.
Chesterton LS; Sim J; Wright CC; Foster NE
Clin J Pain; 2007; 23(9):760-6. PubMed ID: 18075402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of cross-friction algometry procedure in referred muscle pain syndromes: preliminary results of a new referred pain provocation technique with the aid of a Fischer pressure algometer in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
Farasyn AD; Meeusen R; Nijs J
Clin J Pain; 2008 Jun; 24(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 18496311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of repeatability of pressure algometry on the neck muscles for clinical use.
Ylinen J; Nykänen M; Kautiainen H; Häkkinen A
Man Ther; 2007 May; 12(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 16956783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure Pain Threshold in Subjects With Piriformis Syndrome: Test-Retest, Intrarater, and Interrater Reliability, and Minimal Detectible Changes.
Tabatabaiee A; Takamjani IE; Sarrafzadeh J; Salehi R; Ahmadi M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 May; 101(5):781-788. PubMed ID: 31821801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols.
Vaegter HB; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Imai Y; Arendt-Nielsen L
Scand J Pain; 2018 Oct; 18(4):729-737. PubMed ID: 30007061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure-pain threshold algometric measurement in patients with greater trochanteric pain after total hip arthroplasty.
Sayed-Noor AS; Englund E; Wretenberg P; Sjödén GO
Clin J Pain; 2008; 24(3):232-6. PubMed ID: 18287829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of pain pressure threshold algometry in persons with conservatively managed wrist fractures.
Saebø H; Naterstad IF; Stausholm MB; Bjordal JM; Joensen J
Physiother Res Int; 2020 Jan; 25(1):e1797. PubMed ID: 31215131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability, standard error, and minimum detectable change of clinical pressure pain threshold testing in people with and without acute neck pain.
Walton DM; Macdermid JC; Nielson W; Teasell RW; Chiasson M; Brown L
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2011 Sep; 41(9):644-50. PubMed ID: 21885906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is One Trial Sufficient to Obtain Excellent Pressure Pain Threshold Reliability in the Low Back of Asymptomatic Individuals? A Test-Retest Study.
Balaguier R; Madeleine P; Vuillerme N
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160866. PubMed ID: 27513474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of clinical pressure-pain algometric measurements obtained on consecutive days.
Nussbaum EL; Downes L
Phys Ther; 1998 Feb; 78(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 9474108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pressure algometry and palpation of the upper limb peripheral nervous system in subjects with hand osteoarthritis are repeatable and suggest central changes.
Pedersini P; Negrini S; Cantero-Tellez R; Bishop MD; Villafañe JH
J Hand Ther; 2020; 33(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 30679091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold measurements of the upper limb and torso in young healthy women.
Jones DH; Kilgour RD; Comtois AS
J Pain; 2007 Aug; 8(8):650-6. PubMed ID: 17553750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pressure pain threshold of the posterior aspect of the temporomandibular joint measured with a semi-spherical probe.
Nordahl S; Kopp S
J Orofac Pain; 2003; 17(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 12836503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of techniques for evaluation of deep pain sensitivity in the craniofacial region.
Kothari SF; Kothari M; Baad-Hansen L; Svensson P
J Orofac Pain; 2012; 26(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 22838007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Characteristic of the normal values of the pain threshold values in the dorsal region of the young women obtained by the pressure algometry method under different condition].
Kondrashkin PV; Shibkova DZ; Tolstykh EI
Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult; 2017; 94(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 28374728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Within-Session Test-Retest Reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold and Mechanical Temporal Summation in Chronic Low Back Pain.
de Oliveira FCL; Cossette C; Mailloux C; Wideman TH; Beaulieu LD; Massé-Alarie H
Clin J Pain; 2023 May; 39(5):217-225. PubMed ID: 36917769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of pressure pain threshold and visual analog scale findings in chronic whiplash patients.
Prushansky T; Handelzalts S; Pevzner E
Clin J Pain; 2007 May; 23(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 17449995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship between Rate of Algometer Application and Pain Pressure Threshold in the Assessment of Myofascial Trigger Point Sensitivity.
Linde LD; Kumbhare DA; Joshi M; Srbely JZ
Pain Pract; 2018 Feb; 18(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 28440895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term reproducibility of pressure pain thresholds in masticatory muscles measured with a new algometer.
Isselée H; De Laat A; Bogaerts K; Lysens R
J Orofac Pain; 1998; 12(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 9780941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
