These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23499226)

  • 1. The influence of fixed sagittal plane centers of rotation on motion segment mechanics and range of motion in the cervical spine.
    Kelly BP; Zufelt NA; Sander EJ; DiAngelo DJ
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1369-75. PubMed ID: 23499226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
    Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic application of a dynamic resultant force vector using real-time load-control: simulation of an ideal follower load on Cadaveric L4-L5 segments.
    Bennett CR; Kelly BP
    J Biomech; 2013 Aug; 46(12):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23809771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion pattern of the canine cervical spine segment C4-C5.
    Hofstetter M; Gédet P; Doherr M; Ferguson SJ; Forterre F
    Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 19152617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical disc prostheses need a variable center of rotation for flexion / extension below disc level, plus a separate COR for lateral bending above disc level to more closely replicate in-vivo motion: MRI-based biomechanical in-vivo study.
    Muhlbauer MK; Tomasch E; Sinz W; Trattnig S; Steffan H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Mar; 23(1):227. PubMed ID: 35260131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facet joint contact pressure is not significantly affected by ProDisc cervical disc arthroplasty in sagittal bending: a single-level cadaveric study.
    Bauman JA; Jaumard NV; Guarino BB; Weisshaar CL; Lipschutz DE; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):949-59. PubMed ID: 22975463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine.
    Karam YR; Dahdaleh NS; Magnetta MJ; Kim BS; Lim TH; Serhan H; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):E455-60. PubMed ID: 20847712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
    Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
    J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
    Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
    Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.
    Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Voronov LI; Blank KR; Carandang G; Harding DP; Patwardhan AG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():34-41. PubMed ID: 30665037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
    Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does a novel knitted titanium nucleus prosthesis change the kinematics of a cervical spine segment? A biomechanical cadaveric study.
    Ziegler P; Kaps HP; Goerke S; Tendulkar G; Buck Sen A; Nuessler A; Schmoelz W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Mar; 63():134-139. PubMed ID: 30889432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.