These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2349976)

  • 1. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
    Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: the evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis.
    Rosenfeld JP; Skogsberg KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 16102861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response variations to Stroop color-word stimuli.
    Izawa C; Silver NC
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1988 May; 114(2):211-55. PubMed ID: 3402729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Color-word interference in relation to comparative compatibility: evidence for two sources of interference].
    Schulz T; Liebing D
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1991; 38(4):648-68. PubMed ID: 1785215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Jun; 56(3):735-43. PubMed ID: 6877960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New data analysis of the stroop matching task calls for a reevaluation of theory.
    Goldfarb L; Henik A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Feb; 17(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16466415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiovascular response to Stroop: effect of verbal response and task difficulty.
    Boutcher YN; Boutcher SH
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 16730405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing Stroop performance in schizophrenia.
    Barch DM; Carter CS; Cohen JD
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 15291726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidencing inhibitory deficits in Alzheimer's disease through interference effects and shifting disabilities in the Stroop test.
    Amieva H; Lafont S; Rouch-Leroyer I; Rainville C; Dartigues JF; Orgogozo JM; Fabrigoule C
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 19(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 15288332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention and attentional shift efficiency in individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Bergen AM; Mosley JL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 May; 98(6):732-43. PubMed ID: 8054202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stroop dilution but not word-processing dilution: evidence for attention capture.
    Mitterer H; La Heij W; Van der Heijden AH
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 12589448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nicotine Stroop and addiction memory--an ERP study.
    Fehr T; Wiedenmann P; Herrmann M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 16492391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interference and negative priming effects in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E; Rucklidge JJ
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(1):91-122. PubMed ID: 17450641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.