133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23500086)
1. Upfront treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy compared to four-field radiation therapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Lesnock JL; Farris C; Beriwal S; Krivak TC
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):574-9. PubMed ID: 23500086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toxicity and cost-effectiveness analysis of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for postoperative treatment of gynecologic cancers.
Chen LA; Kim J; Boucher K; Terakedis B; Williams B; Nickman NA; Gaffney DK
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 136(3):521-8. PubMed ID: 25562668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in oropharyngeal cancer.
Yong JH; Beca J; O'Sullivan B; Huang SH; McGowan T; Warde P; Hoch JS
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2012 Sep; 24(7):532-8. PubMed ID: 22739256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using decision analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer.
Konski A; Watkins-Bruner D; Feigenberg S; Hanlon A; Kulkarni S; Beck JR; Horwitz EM; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):408-15. PubMed ID: 16887291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protons in head-and-neck cancer: bridging the gap of evidence.
Ramaekers BL; Grutters JP; Pijls-Johannesma M; Lambin P; Joore MA; Langendijk JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Apr; 85(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 23273998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of SBRT versus IMRT for low-risk prostate cancer.
Sher DJ; Parikh RB; Mays-Jackson S; Punglia RS
Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jun; 37(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 23275277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 3D image-guided brachytherapy compared with 2D brachytherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Kim H; Rajagopalan MS; Beriwal S; Huq MS; Smith KJ
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25443528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in prostate cancer.
Yong JH; Beca J; McGowan T; Bremner KE; Warde P; Hoch JS
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2012 Sep; 24(7):521-31. PubMed ID: 22705100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of intensity modulated radiation therapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for anal cancer.
Hodges JC; Beg MS; Das P; Meyer J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(4):773-83. PubMed ID: 24726392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of single fraction of stereotactic body radiation therapy compared with single fraction of external beam radiation therapy for palliation of vertebral bone metastases.
Kim H; Rajagopalan MS; Beriwal S; Huq MS; Smith KJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(3):556-63. PubMed ID: 25680599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcome in posthysterectomy cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent Cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy: comparison with conventional radiotherapy.
Chen MF; Tseng CJ; Tseng CC; Kuo YC; Yu CY; Chen WC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Apr; 67(5):1438-44. PubMed ID: 17394944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy for Preoperative Treatment of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas.
Richard P; Phillips M; Smith W; Davidson D; Kim E; Kane G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Jul; 95(3):999-1008. PubMed ID: 27130792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for advanced cervical cancer: a comparison of dosimetric and clinical outcomes with conventional radiotherapy.
Du XL; Tao J; Sheng XG; Lu CH; Yu H; Wang C; Song QQ; Li QS; Pan CX
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 22198339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IMRT dose escalation for positive para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer while reducing dose to bone marrow and other organs at risk.
Ahmed RS; Kim RY; Duan J; Meleth S; De Los Santos JF; Fiveash JB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 15380585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy versus IMRT alone for pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies.
Milby AB; Both S; Ingram M; Lin LL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(3):e477-84. PubMed ID: 22177626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Lee JY; Kim Y; Lee TJ; Jeon YW; Kim K; Chung HH; Kim HJ; Park SM; Kim JW
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 25925292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of proton beam therapy for treatment decision making in paranasal sinus and nasal cavity cancers in China.
Li G; Qiu B; Huang YX; Doyen J; Bondiau PY; Benezery K; Xia YF; Qian CN
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):599. PubMed ID: 32590957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
Mell LK; Tiryaki H; Ahn KH; Mundt AJ; Roeske JC; Aydogan B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18640499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making a case for high-volume robotic surgery centers: A cost-effectiveness analysis of transoral robotic surgery.
Rudmik L; An W; Livingstone D; Matthews W; Seikaly H; Scrimger R; Marshall D
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 112(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 26171771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for head and neck cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Marta GN; Weltman E; Ferrigno R
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Apr; 64(4):318-323. PubMed ID: 30133610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
