These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23500154)

  • 1. Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews.
    Munder T; Brütsch O; Leonhart R; Gerger H; Barth J
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2013 Jun; 33(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 23500154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the allegiance effect an epiphenomenon of true efficacy differences between treatments? a meta-analysis.
    Munder T; Flückiger C; Gerger H; Wampold BE; Barth J
    J Couns Psychol; 2012 Oct; 59(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 22946981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study.
    Yoder WR; Karyotaki E; Cristea IA; van Duin D; Cuijpers P
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e024622. PubMed ID: 30782912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disclosure of researcher allegiance in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy: a systematic appraisal.
    Dragioti E; Dimoliatis I; Evangelou E
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e007206. PubMed ID: 26033943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the allegiance bias hypothesis: a meta-analysis.
    Munder T; Gerger H; Trelle S; Barth J
    Psychother Res; 2011 Nov; 21(6):670-84. PubMed ID: 21797736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can psychotherapists function as their own controls? Meta-analysis of the crossed therapist design in comparative psychotherapy trials.
    Falkenström F; Markowitz JC; Jonker H; Philips B; Holmqvist R
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2013 May; 74(5):482-91. PubMed ID: 23146326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis.
    Flückiger C; Del Re AC; Wampold BE; Symonds D; Horvath AO
    J Couns Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 21988681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication bias in meta-analyses of the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions for depression.
    Niemeyer H; Musch J; Pietrowsky R
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2013 Feb; 81(1):58-74. PubMed ID: 23244368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research.
    Berkeljon A; Baldwin SA
    Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):511-8. PubMed ID: 20183404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):543-9. PubMed ID: 15878467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relation of the alliance with outcomes in youth psychotherapy: a meta-analysis.
    McLeod BD
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2011 Jun; 31(4):603-16. PubMed ID: 21482319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy versus effectiveness: a direct comparison of the outcome of treatment for mild to moderate depression in randomized controlled trials and daily practice.
    van der Lem R; van der Wee NJ; van Veen T; Zitman FG
    Psychother Psychosom; 2012; 81(4):226-34. PubMed ID: 22584117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.