These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23501702)

  • 1. Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Carter L; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search asymmetry, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Stevenson H; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 21920656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Dec; 21(4):1617-25. PubMed ID: 23000831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study of sustained attention to local and global target features.
    De Joux N; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Apr; 81(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 23375118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS; Kern RP; Walker DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 19589699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18608658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-Alert Training: volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention.
    O'Connell RG; Bellgrove MA; Dockree PM; Lau A; Fitzgerald M; Robertson IH
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1379-90. PubMed ID: 18249419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; Finkbeiner KM; de Joux NR; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2989-98. PubMed ID: 27329605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related differences in the use of automatic and controlled processes in a situation of sustained attention.
    Staub B; Doignon-Camus N; Marques-Carneiro JE; Bacon É; Bonnefond A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():607-16. PubMed ID: 26209357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task.
    Finkbeiner KM; Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25537468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task.
    Head J; Russell PN; Dorahy MJ; Neumann E; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 216(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 22052188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spider stimuli improve response inhibition.
    Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 May; 33():406-13. PubMed ID: 25770464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP components activated by the "GO!" and "WITHHOLD!" conflict in the random Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Zordan L; Sarlo M; Stablum F
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Feb; 66(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17651880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influences of task repetition, napping, time of day, and instruction on the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    van Schie MK; Alblas EE; Thijs RD; Fronczek R; Lammers GJ; van Dijk JG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(10):1055-65. PubMed ID: 25494633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of emotional stimuli on target detection: indirect and direct resource costs.
    Ossowski U; Malinen S; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1649-58. PubMed ID: 21978909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring sustained attention after traumatic brain injury: differences in key findings from the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Whyte J; Grieb-Neff P; Gantz C; Polansky M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):2007-14. PubMed ID: 16682059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating sustained attention ability in the elderly by using two different approaches: inhibiting ongoing behavior versus responding on rare occasions.
    Staub B; Doignon-Camus N; Bacon E; Bonnefond A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():51-7. PubMed ID: 24378237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?
    Head J; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):913-9. PubMed ID: 23838467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prolonging the response movement inhibits the feed-forward motor program in the sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; de Joux NR; Finkbeiner KM; Russell PN; Retzler JR; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():75-84. PubMed ID: 29351864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.