These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23501945)

  • 1. Fractional flow in fractured chalk; a flow and tracer test revisited.
    Odling NE; West LJ; Hartmann S; Kilpatrick A
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Apr; 147():96-111. PubMed ID: 23501945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-directional tracer test in the fractured Chalk aquifer of E. Yorkshire, UK.
    Hartmann S; Odling NE; West LJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Dec; 94(3-4):315-31. PubMed ID: 17761342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving estimates of groundwater velocity in a fractured rock borehole using hydraulic and tracer dilution methods.
    Maldaner CH; Quinn PM; Cherry JA; Parker BL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jul; 214():75-86. PubMed ID: 29907430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solute transport in crystalline rocks at Aspö--I: geological basis and model calibration.
    Mazurek M; Jakob A; Bossart P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Mar; 61(1-4):157-74. PubMed ID: 12598102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling the migration of contaminants through variably saturated dual-porosity, dual-permeability chalk.
    Brouyère S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(3-4):195-219. PubMed ID: 16303208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Poroelastic effects on fracture characterization.
    Burbey TJ
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(6):904-13. PubMed ID: 23387850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using constant head step tests to determine hydraulic apertures in fractured rock.
    Quinn PM; Parker BL; Cherry JA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Sep; 126(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 21885152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Groundwater flow velocities in a fractured carbonate aquifer-type: Implications for contaminant transport.
    Medici G; West LJ; Banwart SA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Apr; 222():1-16. PubMed ID: 30795856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geostatistical Borehole Image-Based Mapping of Karst-Carbonate Aquifer Pores.
    Sukop MC; Cunningham KJ
    Ground Water; 2016 Mar; 54(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 26174850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Redistribution of contaminants by a fluctuating water table in a micro-porous, double-porosity aquifer: field observations and model simulations.
    Fretwell BA; Burgess WG; Barker JA; Jefferies NL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Jun; 78(1-2):27-52. PubMed ID: 15949606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of piezometer construction on groundwater sampling in fractured rock.
    Kozuskanich J; Novakowski KS; Anderson BC
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):266-78. PubMed ID: 21797851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of some in situ tracer tests with sorbing tracers using independent data.
    Neretnieks I; Moreno L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Mar; 61(1-4):351-60. PubMed ID: 12598116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of unsaturated flow and solute transport through waste rock at two experimental scales using temporal moments and numerical modeling.
    Blackmore S; Smith L; Ulrich Mayer K; Beckie RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Dec; 171():49-65. PubMed ID: 25461887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Leaky Aquifer Models to Simulate the Well Flow in Fractured Aquifers with Linear Interporosity Flow.
    Székely F; Szűcs P; Zákányi B
    Ground Water; 2019 Sep; 57(5):687-692. PubMed ID: 30614520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The unusual and large drawdown response of buried-valley aquifers to pumping.
    van der Kamp G; Maathuis H
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 21671937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Particle Swarm Optimization for inverse modeling of solute transport in fractured gneiss aquifer.
    Abdelaziz R; Zambrano-Bigiarini M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Aug; 164():285-98. PubMed ID: 25035936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applied tracer tests in fractured rock: Can we predict natural gradient solute transport more accurately than fracture and matrix parameters?
    Weatherill D; Cook PG; Simmons CT; Robinson NI
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Dec; 88(3-4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16959371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation of injection-withdrawal tracer experiments conducted between two wells in a large single fracture.
    Novakowski KS; Bickerton G; Lapcevic P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):227-47. PubMed ID: 15336796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalized radial flow in synthetic flow systems.
    Bowman DO; Roberts RM; Holt RM
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 23198816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating flow using tracers and hydraulics in synthetic heterogeneous aquifers.
    Larocque M; Cook PG; Haaken K; Simmons CT
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(6):786-96. PubMed ID: 19563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.