399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23502430)
1. Identification of prognostic gene signatures of glioblastoma: a study based on TCGA data analysis.
Kim YW; Koul D; Kim SH; Lucio-Eterovic AK; Freire PR; Yao J; Wang J; Almeida JS; Aldape K; Yung WK
Neuro Oncol; 2013 Jul; 15(7):829-39. PubMed ID: 23502430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An integrative characterization of recurrent molecular aberrations in glioblastoma genomes.
Sintupisut N; Liu PL; Yeang CH
Nucleic Acids Res; 2013 Oct; 41(19):8803-21. PubMed ID: 23907387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcriptome profiling-based identification of prognostic subtypes and multi-omics signatures of glioblastoma.
Park J; Shim JK; Yoon SJ; Kim SH; Chang JH; Kang SG
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10555. PubMed ID: 31332251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establish six-gene prognostic model for glioblastoma based on multi-omics data of TCGA database.
Lei CG; Jia XY; Sun WJ
Yi Chuan; 2021 Jul; 43(7):665-679. PubMed ID: 34284982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic identification of lncRNA-based prognostic biomarkers for glioblastoma.
Li M; Long S; Hu J; Wang Z; Geng C; Ou S
Aging (Albany NY); 2019 Nov; 11(21):9405-9423. PubMed ID: 31692451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying dysfunctional miRNA-mRNA regulatory modules by inverse activation, cofunction, and high interconnection of target genes: a case study of glioblastoma.
Xiao Y; Ping Y; Fan H; Xu C; Guan J; Zhao H; Li Y; Lv Y; Jin Y; Wang L; Li X
Neuro Oncol; 2013 Jul; 15(7):818-28. PubMed ID: 23516263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unique genome-wide map of TCF4 and STAT3 targets using ChIP-seq reveals their association with new molecular subtypes of glioblastoma.
Zhang JX; Zhang J; Yan W; Wang YY; Han L; Yue X; Liu N; You YP; Jiang T; Pu PY; Kang CS
Neuro Oncol; 2013 Mar; 15(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 23295773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Construction of co-expression modules related to survival by WGCNA and identification of potential prognostic biomarkers in glioblastoma.
Zhou J; Guo H; Liu L; Hao S; Guo Z; Zhang F; Gao Y; Wang Z; Zhang W
J Cell Mol Med; 2021 Feb; 25(3):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 33449451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of Key Pathways and Genes in the Orai2 Mediated Classical and Mesenchymal Subtype of Glioblastoma by Bioinformatic Analyses.
Yuan F; Yi L; Hai L; Wang Y; Yang Y; Li T; Tong L; Ma H; Liu P; Ming H; Ren B; Yu S; Lin Y; Yang X
Dis Markers; 2019; 2019():7049294. PubMed ID: 31772693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of alternative splicing signatures in the prognosis of glioblastoma.
Xie ZC; Wu HY; Dang YW; Chen G
Cancer Med; 2019 Dec; 8(18):7623-7636. PubMed ID: 31674730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glioblastoma Multiforme: Fewer Tumor Copy Number Segments of the
Lehrer S; Rheinstein PH; Rosenzweig KE
Cancer Genomics Proteomics; 2018; 15(4):273-278. PubMed ID: 29976632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. GSVD comparison of patient-matched normal and tumor aCGH profiles reveals global copy-number alterations predicting glioblastoma multiforme survival.
Lee CH; Alpert BO; Sankaranarayanan P; Alter O
PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30098. PubMed ID: 22291905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An eight-mRNA signature outperforms the lncRNA-based signature in predicting prognosis of patients with glioblastoma.
Gong Z; Hong F; Wang H; Zhang X; Chen J
BMC Med Genet; 2020 Mar; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 32188434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression and prognostic significance of TCTN1 in human glioblastoma.
Meng D; Chen Y; Zhao Y; Wang J; Yun D; Yang S; Chen J; Chen H; Lu D
J Transl Med; 2014 Oct; 12():288. PubMed ID: 25304031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A 63 signature genes prediction system is effective for glioblastoma prognosis.
Zhang Y; Xu J; Zhu X
Int J Mol Med; 2018 Apr; 41(4):2070-2078. PubMed ID: 29393370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic identification, development, and validation of prognostic biomarkers involving the tumor-immune microenvironment for glioblastoma.
Zhao B; Wang Y; Wang Y; Chen W; Liu PH; Kong Z; Dai C; Wang Y; Ma W
J Cell Physiol; 2021 Jan; 236(1):507-522. PubMed ID: 32572951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A robust two-gene signature for glioblastoma survival prediction.
Pan Y; Zhang JH; Zhao L; Guo JC; Wang S; Zhao Y; Tao S; Wang H; Zhu YB
J Cell Biochem; 2020 Jul; 121(7):3593-3605. PubMed ID: 31960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between SNAP25 and human glioblastoma multiform: a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis.
Yu C; Yin J; Wang X; Chen L; Wei Y; Lu C; You Y
Biosci Rep; 2020 Jun; 40(6):. PubMed ID: 32412599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome-wide methylomic and transcriptomic analyses identify subtype-specific epigenetic signatures commonly dysregulated in glioma stem cells and glioblastoma.
Pangeni RP; Zhang Z; Alvarez AA; Wan X; Sastry N; Lu S; Shi T; Huang T; Lei CX; James CD; Kessler JA; Brennan CW; Nakano I; Lu X; Hu B; Zhang W; Cheng SY
Epigenetics; 2018; 13(4):432-448. PubMed ID: 29927689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioinformatics analysis of potential core genes for glioblastoma.
Zhang Y; Yang X; Zhu XL; Hao JQ; Bai H; Xiao YC; Wang ZZ; Hao CY; Duan HB
Biosci Rep; 2020 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 32667033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
