257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23503808)
1. Cervical vertebral column morphology in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea assessed using lateral cephalograms and cone beam CT. A comparative study.
Sonnesen L; Jensen KE; Petersson AR; Petri N; Berg S; Svanholt P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20130060. PubMed ID: 23503808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of cephalograms derived of cone beam computed tomography versus lateral cephalograms to estimate cervical vertebrae maturity in a Peruvian population: A retrospective study.
Echevarría-Sánchez G; Arriola-Guillén LE; Malpartida-Carrillo V; Tinedo-López PL; Palti-Menendez R; Guerrero ME
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 32014428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical column morphology in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.
Sonnesen L; Petri N; Kjaer I; Svanholt P
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 18647950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Illusions of fusions: assessing cervical vertebral fusion on lateral cephalograms, multidetector computed tomographs, and cone-beam computed tomographs.
Patcas R; Tausch D; Pandis N; Manestar M; Ullrich O; Karlo CA; Peltomäki T; Kellenberger CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 23374928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of type of radiograph and levels of experience and training on reproducibility of the cervical vertebral maturation method.
Khajah A; Tadinada A; Allareddy V; Kuo CL; Nanda R; Uribe F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Feb; 157(2):228-239. PubMed ID: 32005475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical vertebrae anomalies in subjects with Class II malocclusion assessed by lateral cephalogram and cone beam computed tomography.
Bebnowski D; Hänggi MP; Markic G; Roos M; Peltomäki T
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 21252190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations between craniofacial morphology, head posture, and cervical vertebral body fusions in men with sleep apnea.
Svanholt P; Petri N; Wildschiødtz G; Sonnesen L; Kjaer I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):702.e1-9; discussion 702-3. PubMed ID: 19524827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical vertebrae maturation index estimates on cone beam CT: 3D reconstructions vs sagittal sections.
Bonfim MA; Costa AL; Fuziy A; Ximenez ME; Cotrim-Ferreira FA; Ferreira-Santos RI
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150162. PubMed ID: 26509559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical vertebrae anomalies in orthodontic patients: a growth-based superimpositional approach.
Koletsis DD; Halazonetis DJ
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 19525440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of ponticulus posticus on digital lateral cephalograms and cone beam computed tomography in patients with migraine and healthy individuals: a comparative study.
Sabir H; Kumbhare S; Rout P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 25151589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of upper airway volume with lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography.
Feng X; Li G; Qu Z; Liu L; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 25636553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Ten-point" 3D cephalometric analysis using low-dosage cone beam computed tomography.
Farronato G; Garagiola U; Dominici A; Periti G; de Nardi S; Carletti V; Farronato D
Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 20529623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of manual, digital and lateral CBCT cephalometric analyses.
Navarro Rde L; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Fernandes TM; Oliveira GF; Conti AC; Almeida MR; Almeida RR
J Appl Oral Sci; 2013; 21(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 23739848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
