These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23503877)

  • 1. 1.2 French stone retrieval baskets further enhance irrigation flow in flexible ureterorenoscopy.
    Bedke J; Leichtle U; Lorenz A; Nagele U; Stenzl A; Kruck S
    Urolithiasis; 2013 Apr; 41(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 23503877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alteration in irrigant flow and deflection of flexible ureteroscopes with nitinol baskets.
    Ames CD; Perrone JM; Weld KJ; Foyil KV; Yan Y; Venkatesh R; Landman J
    J Endourol; 2006 Jan; 20(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 16426138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Size does matter: 1.5 Fr. stone baskets almost double irrigation flow during flexible ureteroscopy compared to 1.9 Fr. stone baskets.
    Nagele U; Horstmann M; Hennenlotter J; Walcher U; Kuczyk MA; Sievert KD; Stenzl A; Anastasiadis AG
    Urol Res; 2006 Dec; 34(6):389-92. PubMed ID: 17082921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bare naked baskets: ureteroscope deflection and flow characteristics with intact and disassembled ureteroscopic nitinol stone baskets.
    Landman J; Monga M; El-Gabry EA; Rehman J; Lee DI; Bhayani S; Sundaram CP; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2377-9. PubMed ID: 11992041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical analysis of the miniaturized stone basket: effect on deflection and flow rate.
    Magheli A; Semins MJ; Allaf ME; Matlaga BR
    J Endourol; 2012 Mar; 26(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 22022885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tipless Nitinol Stone Baskets: Comparison of Penetration Force, Radial Dilation Force, Opening Dynamics, and Deflection.
    Patel N; Akhavein A; Hinck B; Jain R; Monga M
    Urology; 2017 May; 103():256-260. PubMed ID: 28104422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation.
    Kruck S; Anastasiadis AG; Gakis G; Walcher U; Hennenlotter J; Merseburger AS; Stenzl A; Nagele U
    Urol Res; 2011 Dec; 39(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 21442342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Peditrol irrigation device and common methods of irrigation.
    Blew BD; Dagnone AJ; Pace KT; Honey RJ
    J Endourol; 2005 Jun; 19(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 15989446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel dual-diameter ureteroscope working channel: impact on irrigant flow.
    Monga M; Hendlin K; Skenazy J; Ramani A
    Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):892-4. PubMed ID: 15533472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can We Provide Low Intrarenal Pressures with Good Irrigation Flow by Decreasing the Size of Ureteral Access Sheaths?
    Sener TE; Cloutier J; Villa L; Marson F; Butticè S; Doizi S; Traxer O
    J Endourol; 2016 Jan; 30(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 26381037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Nanopulse Lithotripter to the Holmium Laser: Stone Fragmentation Efficiency and Impact on Flexible Ureteroscope Deflection and Flow.
    Kaplan AG; Chen TT; Sankin G; Yang C; Dale JA; Simmons WN; Zhong P; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1150-1154. PubMed ID: 27736195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working tools in flexible ureterorenoscopy--influence on flow and deflection: what does matter?
    Bach T; Geavlete B; Herrmann TR; Gross AJ
    J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1639-43. PubMed ID: 18620506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The broken stone basket: configuration and technique for removal.
    Gallentine ML; Bishoff JT; Harmon WJ
    J Endourol; 2001 Nov; 15(9):911-4. PubMed ID: 11769845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avoiding a Lemon: Performance Consistency of Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
    Winship B; Wollin D; Carlos E; Li J; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 30612445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application.
    Wendt-Nordahl G; Trojan L; Alken P; Michel MS; Knoll T
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1439-44. PubMed ID: 18186680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic Valves and Irrigation Devices for Flexible Ureteroscopy: Is There a Difference?
    Tarplin S; Byrne M; Farrell N; Monga M; Sivalingam S
    J Endourol; 2015 Sep; 29(9):983-92. PubMed ID: 25793630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
    Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of irrigation flows between different irrigation methods for flexible ureteroscopy: An in vitro study.
    Grinholtz D; Kamkoum H; Capretti C; Traxer O; Doizi S
    Prog Urol; 2022 Jul; 32(8-9):616-622. PubMed ID: 35027282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of Irrigation Flowrate During Flexible Ureteroscopy: Methods for Calculation Using Renal Pelvis Pressure.
    Rezakahn Khajeh N; Hall TL; Ghani KR; Roberts WW
    J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1405-1410. PubMed ID: 35974664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a Novel Female Gender Flexible Ureteroscope: Comparison of Flow and Deflection to a Standard Flexible Ureteroscope.
    Karani R; Arada RB; Ayad M; Xie L; Brevik A; Peta A; Jiang P; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):840-846. PubMed ID: 33439772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.