328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23504140)
21. Trends in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Distal Pancreatectomy.
Caba Molina D; Lambreton F; Arrangoiz Majul R
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):147-151. PubMed ID: 30222522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review.
Boggi U; Amorese G; Vistoli F; Caniglia F; De Lio N; Perrone V; Barbarello L; Belluomini M; Signori S; Mosca F
Surg Endosc; 2015 Jan; 29(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 25125092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for PNETs: laparoscopic or robotic approach?
Zhang J; Jin J; Chen S; Gu J; Zhu Y; Qin K; Zhan Q; Cheng D; Chen H; Deng X; Shen B; Peng C
Oncotarget; 2017 May; 8(20):33872-33883. PubMed ID: 28477012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness of Tachosil(®) in the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hüttner FJ; Mihaljevic AL; Hackert T; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Diener MK
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 Mar; 401(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 26897031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical methods influence on the risk of anastomotic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Wang K; Dong SS; Zhang W; Ni YY; Xie F; Wang JC; Wang XH; Li YW
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3380-3397. PubMed ID: 36627536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis.
Guerrini GP; Lauretta A; Belluco C; Olivieri M; Forlin M; Basso S; Breda B; Bertola G; Di Benedetto F
BMC Surg; 2017 Nov; 17(1):105. PubMed ID: 29121885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Restrictive Perioperative Fluid Management in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Chen BP; Chen M; Bennett S; Lemon K; Bertens KA; Balaa FK; Martel G
World J Surg; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2938-2950. PubMed ID: 29464346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A propensity score-matched study.
Liu R; Liu Q; Zhao ZM; Tan XL; Gao YX; Zhao GD
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):461-469. PubMed ID: 28628713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Central
Li Y; Li Y
Am Surg; 2019 Nov; 85(11):1239-1245. PubMed ID: 31775965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen K; Liu XL; Pan Y; Maher H; Wang XF
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 29969999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patients get more long-term benefit from central pancreatectomy than distal resection: a meta-analysis.
Xu SB; Zhu YP; Zhou W; Xie K; Mou YP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 39(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 23465182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic versus Robotic Peripheral Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mavrovounis G; Diamantis A; Perivoliotis K; Symeonidis D; Volakakis G; Tepetes K
J BUON; 2020; 25(5):2456-2475. PubMed ID: 33277870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen K; Pan Y; Zhang B; Maher H; Cai XJ
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():243-256. PubMed ID: 29337177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: a valid option?
Jung MK; Buchs NC; Azagury DE; Hagen ME; Morel P
Minerva Chir; 2013 Oct; 68(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 24101006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage after pancreatic resection.
Dou CW; Liu ZK; Jia YL; Zheng X; Tu KS; Yao YM; Liu QG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5719-34. PubMed ID: 25987799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility.
Zureikat AH; Moser AJ; Boone BA; Bartlett DL; Zenati M; Zeh HJ
Ann Surg; 2013 Oct; 258(4):554-9; discussion 559-62. PubMed ID: 24002300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Role of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery: lessons learned from our initial experience.
Vicente E; Quijano Y; Ielpo B; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Malave L; Caruso R
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2017 Dec; 16(6):652-658. PubMed ID: 29291786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Effect of Body Mass Index on Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
You L; Zhao W; Hong X; Ma L; Ren X; Shao Q; Du Y; Cong L; Zhao Y
Pancreas; 2016 Jul; 45(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 27295531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature.
Kornaropoulos M; Moris D; Beal EW; Makris MC; Mitrousias A; Petrou A; Felekouras E; Michalinos A; Vailas M; Schizas D; Papalampros A
Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4382-4392. PubMed ID: 28389798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
