304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23504350)
21. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms.
Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling using core biopsy needle as a percutaneous biopsy rescue for diagnosis of solid liver mass: Combined histological-cytological analysis.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Lee TH; Cha SW; Kim SG; Kim YS
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1161-6. PubMed ID: 25684303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses.
Iglesias-Garcia J; Lariño-Noia J; Abdulkader I; Domínguez-Muñoz JE
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 20(28):9451-7. PubMed ID: 25071339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors.
El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.
Keswani RN; Krishnan K; Wani S; Keefer L; Komanduri S
Clin Endosc; 2014 May; 47(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 24944988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Histopathological comparison of aspiration and biopsy needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with subepithelial lesions.
Watanabe M; Okuwaki K; Kida M; Tadehara M; Adachi K; Masutani H; Tamaki A; Imaizumi H; Iwai T; Yamauchi H; Kaneko T; Hasegawa R; Kurosu T; Koizumi W
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jul; 49(7):856-863. PubMed ID: 33885229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Feasibility of a 20-gauge ProCore needle in EUS-guided subepithelial tumor sampling: a prospective multicenter study.
Kim DH; Kim GH; Cho CM; Park CH; Na SY; Kim TH; Cho YK; Kim JH; Seo DW;
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):151. PubMed ID: 30340469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic yield of the SharkCore EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.
Fitzpatrick MJ; Hernandez-Barco YG; Krishnan K; Brugge W; Casey B; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):212-219. PubMed ID: 31076375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Histologic Core Portions Acquired from a Core Biopsy Needle and a Conventional Needle in Solid Mass Lesions: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Lee BS; Cho CM; Jung MK; Jang JS; Bae HI
Gut Liver; 2017 Jul; 11(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 28208006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) with a new slim linear echoendoscope.
Iglesias-García J; Lariño-Noia J; Vallejo-Senra N; de-la-Iglesia-García D; Abdulkader-Nallib I; Domínguez-Muñoz JE
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2015 Jun; 107(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 26031864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of visual on-site evaluation (Vose) In predicting the adequacy of Eus-guided fine needle biopsy: A single center prospective study.
Stigliano S; Balassone V; Biasutto D; Covotta F; Signoretti M; Di Matteo FM
Pancreatology; 2021 Jan; 21(1):312-317. PubMed ID: 33358086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment.
Khan MA; Grimm IS; Ali B; Nollan R; Tombazzi C; Ismail MK; Baron TH
Endosc Int Open; 2017 May; 5(5):E363-E375. PubMed ID: 28497108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration
Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Farias GFA; Madruga-Neto AC; Ryou M; Thompson CC
World J Clin Cases; 2021 Dec; 9(34):10507-10517. PubMed ID: 35004982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB.
Gan Q; Roy-Chowdhuri S; Duose DY; Stewart JM; Coronel E; Bhutani MS; Lee JH; Weston B; Ge PS; Ross WA; Maitra A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Apr; 130(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 34905283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative diagnostic yield of different endoscopic techniques for tissue sampling of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Colombo M; Ramai D; Mangiavillano B; Chandan S; Gkolfakis P; Mohan B; Hassan C; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2024 Jan; 56(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 37591258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions.
Mehmood S; Jahan A; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 43(4):278-86. PubMed ID: 25088987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
