These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

518 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23504717)

  • 21. Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands.
    Soussana JF; Tallec T; Blanfort V
    Animal; 2010 Mar; 4(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 22443939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The potential of Turkey's province-based livestock sector to mitigate GHG emissions through biogas production.
    Ersoy E; Ugurlu A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 255():109858. PubMed ID: 32063318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Indian livestock.
    Patra AK
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Oct; 14(10):2673-84. PubMed ID: 22898933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Emissions savings in the corn-ethanol life cycle from feeding coproducts to livestock.
    Bremer VR; Liska AJ; Klopfenstein TJ; Erickson GE; Yang HS; Walters DT; Cassman KG
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(2):472-82. PubMed ID: 20176820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector.
    Harrison MT; Cullen BR; Mayberry DE; Cowie AL; Bilotto F; Badgery WB; Liu K; Davison T; Christie KM; Muleke A; Eckard RJ
    Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Nov; 27(22):5726-5761. PubMed ID: 34314548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantifying and managing regional greenhouse gas emissions: waste sector of Daejeon, Korea.
    Yi S; Yang H; Lee SH; An KJ
    J Environ Sci (China); 2014 Jun; 26(6):1249-59. PubMed ID: 25079833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relevance of methane emissions from beef production and the challenges of the Argentinean beef production platform.
    Rearte DH; Pordomingo AJ
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 25027797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options.
    Hristov AN; Ott T; Tricarico J; Rotz A; Waghorn G; Adesogan A; Dijkstra J; Montes F; Oh J; Kebreab E; Oosting SJ; Gerber PJ; Henderson B; Makkar HP; Firkins JL
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5095-113. PubMed ID: 24045470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of intensification of pastoral farming on greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand.
    Pinares-Patino CS; Waghorn GC; Hegarty RS; Hoskin SO
    N Z Vet J; 2009 Oct; 57(5):252-61. PubMed ID: 19802038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock.
    Gill M; Smith P; Wilkinson JM
    Animal; 2010 Mar; 4(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 22443938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Carbon Navigator: a decision support tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production systems.
    Murphy P; Crosson P; O'Brien D; Schulte RP
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():427-36. PubMed ID: 23739484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selecting land-based mitigation practices to reduce GHG emissions from the rural land use sector: a case study of North East Scotland.
    Feliciano D; Hunter C; Slee B; Smith P
    J Environ Manage; 2013 May; 120():93-104. PubMed ID: 23507248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.
    Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the effect of accounting method, IPCC v. LCA, on grass-based and confinement dairy systems' greenhouse gas emissions.
    O'Brien D; Shalloo L; Patton J; Buckley F; Grainger C; Wallace M
    Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1512-27. PubMed ID: 23031525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970-2050.
    Bennetzen EH; Smith P; Porter JR
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Feb; 22(2):763-81. PubMed ID: 26451699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China.
    Zhao W; van der Voet E; Zhang Y; Huppes G
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(5):1517-26. PubMed ID: 19068268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantifying opportunities for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation using big data from smallholder crop and livestock farmers across Bangladesh.
    Sapkota TB; Khanam F; Mathivanan GP; Vetter S; Hussain SG; Pilat AL; Shahrin S; Hossain MK; Sarker NR; Krupnik TJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Sep; 786():147344. PubMed ID: 33971592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective.
    Llonch P; Haskell MJ; Dewhurst RJ; Turner SP
    Animal; 2017 Feb; 11(2):274-284. PubMed ID: 27406001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from different dairy systems in the Waikato region of New Zealand.
    Adler AA; Doole GJ; Romera AJ; Beukes PC
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Dec; 131():33-43. PubMed ID: 24140485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.