These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Uncertainty in assessing the impacts of global change with coupled dynamic species distribution and population models. Conlisk E; Syphard AD; Franklin J; Flint L; Flint A; Regan H Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Mar; 19(3):858-69. PubMed ID: 23504842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avian distributions under climate change: towards improved projections. La Sorte FA; Jetz W J Exp Biol; 2010 Mar; 213(6):862-9. PubMed ID: 20190111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The demographic impact of extreme events: stochastic weather drives survival and population dynamics in a long-lived seabird. Frederiksen M; Daunt F; Harris MP; Wanless S J Anim Ecol; 2008 Sep; 77(5):1020-9. PubMed ID: 18557956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population Trends of Central European Montane Birds Provide Evidence for Adverse Impacts of Climate Change on High-Altitude Species. Flousek J; Telenský T; Hanzelka J; Reif J PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139465. PubMed ID: 26426901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Projecting demographic responses to climate change: adult and juvenile survival respond differently to direct and indirect effects of weather in a passerine population. Dybala KE; Eadie JM; Gardali T; Seavy NE; Herzog MP Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Sep; 19(9):2688-97. PubMed ID: 23606580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continent-scale global change attribution in European birds - combining annual and decadal time scales. Jørgensen PS; Böhning-Gaese K; Thorup K; Tøttrup AP; Chylarecki P; Jiguet F; Lehikoinen A; Noble DG; Reif J; Schmid H; van Turnhout C; Burfield IJ; Foppen R; Voříšek P; van Strien A; Gregory RD; Rahbek C Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Feb; 22(2):530-43. PubMed ID: 26486804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population dynamics can be more important than physiological limits for determining range shifts under climate change. Fordham DA; Mellin C; Russell BD; Akçakaya RH; Bradshaw CJ; Aiello-Lammens ME; Caley JM; Connell SD; Mayfield S; Shepherd SA; Brook BW Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Oct; 19(10):3224-37. PubMed ID: 23907833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current temporal trends in moth abundance are counter to predicted effects of climate change in an assemblage of subarctic forest moths. Hunter MD; Kozlov MV; Itämies J; Pulliainen E; Bäck J; Kyrö EM; Niemelä P Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jun; 20(6):1723-37. PubMed ID: 24421221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Game theory sheds new light on ecological responses to current climate change when phenology is historically mismatched. Johansson J; Jonzén N Ecol Lett; 2012 Aug; 15(8):881-8. PubMed ID: 22676374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Climate warming alters effects of management on population viability of threatened species: results from a 30-year experimental study on a rare orchid. Sletvold N; Dahlgren JP; Oien DI; Moen A; Ehrlén J Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Sep; 19(9):2729-38. PubMed ID: 23504932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Matching the multiple scales of conservation with the multiple scales of climate change. Wiens JA; Bachelet D Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 20121841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]