These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23505855)
21. Marginal bone loss with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different loading protocols and attachment systems: 10-year outcomes. Ma S; Tawse-Smith A; Thomson WM; Payne AG Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):321-32. PubMed ID: 20617220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A technique for constructing a new maxillary overdenture to a nonretrievable implant connecting bar. Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Goktug G J Oral Implantol; 2013 Feb; 39(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 21366443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Locator or ball attachment: a guide for clinical decision making]. Büttel AE; Bühler NM; Marinello CP Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(9):901-18. PubMed ID: 19852208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cement-retained bar attachment system for implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Ozcelik TB; Ozcelik O; Pektas ZO J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):315-7. PubMed ID: 17547953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG. Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An overview of the Lew attachment: clinical reports. Piermatti J; Winkler S J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 12498431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study. Wahab LA; Sadig W Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 19149068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol. Walton JN Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes. Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]