These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23505955)

  • 1. Negative patterning and biconditional discriminations in human causal reasoning: a second look.
    Whitlow JW
    Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23505955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW; Loatman PA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of outcome valence on positive and negative patterning in human causal reasoning.
    Whitlow JW
    Learn Behav; 2010 May; 38(2):145-59. PubMed ID: 20400734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 18248121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations.
    Delamater AR; Garr E; Lawrence S; Whitlow JW
    Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():40-52. PubMed ID: 27826037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A positive patterning advantage with complex but not simple patterning: a cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2118-34. PubMed ID: 23506406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible Configural Learning of Non-Linear Discriminations and Detection of Stimulus Compounds.
    Glautier S; Menneer T; Godwin HJ; Donnelly N; Aristizabal JA
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jul; 63(4):215-236. PubMed ID: 27750517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of pretraining on acquisition of novel configural discriminations in human predictive learning.
    Mehta R; Russell E
    Learn Behav; 2009 Nov; 37(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 19815928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluid Abilities and Rule Learning: Patterning and Biconditional Discriminations.
    Baetu I; Burns NR; Yu E; Baker AG
    J Intell; 2018 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 31162434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA; Johnson JL; Jones FL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 10881604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some properties of configural learning: an investigation of the transverse-patterning problem.
    Alvarado MC; Rudy JW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Apr; 18(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 1583444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the unique cue in configural discriminations.
    Rescorla RA; Grau JW; Durlach PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Jul; 11(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 4009124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
    Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configural discriminations.
    Rudy JW; Sutherland RJ
    Behav Brain Res; 1989 Aug; 34(1-2):97-109. PubMed ID: 2765175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association rules for rat spatial learning: the importance of the hippocampus for binding item identity with item location.
    Albasser MM; Dumont JR; Amin E; Holmes JD; Horne MR; Pearce JM; Aggleton JP
    Hippocampus; 2013 Dec; 23(12):1162-78. PubMed ID: 23749378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative patterning is easier than a biconditional discrimination.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ; Gharaei S; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Oct; 34(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 18954233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.