These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23506085)

  • 1. The illusion of argument justification.
    Fisher M; Keil FC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):425-33. PubMed ID: 23506085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judging the implications of a concession: Conversational distance and belief bias effects.
    Ricco RB; Sierra A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1129-44. PubMed ID: 26183024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of argument structure on judgements of argument strength, function, and adequacy.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Apr; 61(4):641-64. PubMed ID: 18938280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education.
    Chowning JT; Griswold JC; Kovarik DN; Collins LJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36791. PubMed ID: 22615814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays.
    Bråten I; Ferguson LE; Strømsø HI; Anmarkrud Ø
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Mar; 84(Pt 1):58-85. PubMed ID: 24547754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metacognition in argument generation: the misperceived relationship between emotional investment and argument quality.
    Johnson DR; Tynan ME; Cuthbert AS; O'Quinn JK
    Cogn Emot; 2018 May; 32(3):566-578. PubMed ID: 28553747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Children as Investigators of Brunerian "Possible Worlds". The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children's Argumentative Thinking.
    Iannaccone A; Perret-Clermont AN; Convertini J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2019 Dec; 53(4):679-693. PubMed ID: 31729627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Actor perspective and moral reasoning: Do levels of criminal thinking moderate this relationship among non-criminals?
    K Miller O; Batastini AB; L Standridge R; Repke A; S Mohn R
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):992-1002. PubMed ID: 33506511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children's reasoning with peers in cooperative and competitive contexts.
    Domberg A; Köymen B; Tomasello M
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2018 Mar; 36(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 28940379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation.
    Guillaume M; Cramer M; van der Torre L; Schiltz C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273225. PubMed ID: 35984811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Justifications for coercive care in child and adolescent psychiatry, a content analysis of medical documentation in Sweden.
    Pelto-Piri V; Kjellin L; Lindvall C; Engström I
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26893126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
    Stanovich KE; West RF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):672-95. PubMed ID: 18361678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defeasible reasoning in high-functioning adults with autism: evidence for impaired exception-handling.
    Pijnacker J; Geurts B; van Lambalgen M; Kan CC; Buitelaar JK; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):644-51. PubMed ID: 19063905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The illusion of nonmediation in telecommunication: voice intensity biases distance judgments to a communication partner.
    Zhang C; Lakens D; IJsselsteijn WA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():101-5. PubMed ID: 25747576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty.
    Straßer C; Michajlova L
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1133998. PubMed ID: 37275534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of power and reason on young Maya children's endorsement of testimony.
    Castelain T; Bernard S; Van der Henst JB; Mercier H
    Dev Sci; 2016 Nov; 19(6):957-966. PubMed ID: 26353856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rubber hand illusion in action.
    Kammers MP; de Vignemont F; Verhagen L; Dijkerman HC
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):204-11. PubMed ID: 18762203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring university students' ability to recognize argument structures and fallacies.
    Berkle Y; Schmitt L; Tolzin A; Janson A; Wambsganss T; Leimeister JM; Leuchter M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1270931. PubMed ID: 38125865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.