80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23506198)
1. The invasive cervical cancer review: psychological issues surrounding disclosure.
Sherman SM; Moss E; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 23506198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disclosure of cervical cancer audits: how to be honest without making matters worse.
Herbert A
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 23506197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytological screening history of patients with early invasive cervical cancer.
Turner MJ; Keane DP; Flannelly GM; Lenehan PM; Murphy JF; Foley ME
Ir Med J; 1990 Jun; 83(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 2202697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new method for the classification of invasive cervical cancer screening histories.
Bagnall H; Pearmain P; Clare J; Lawrence G
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(3):137-47. PubMed ID: 17007655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Australian women's needs and preferences for information about human papillomavirus in cervical screening.
McCaffery K; Irwig L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 16156944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.
Prescrire Int; 2010 Aug; 19(108):172-7, 179. PubMed ID: 20939454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Changes in awareness of cervical cancer patients after medical treatments and the correlation of cervical screening situation and clinical stage at consultation].
Wang CF; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 May; 47(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 22883525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disclosing the results of the invasive cervical cancer review to patients: a survey of lead colposcopists across England.
Sherman SM; Nailer E; Pearmain P; Todd RW; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2016 Aug; 27(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 26566859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cytological history of 101 patients with invasive cancer of the uterine cervix].
Vincenzoni C; Mariani L; Vocaturo G; Lombardi A; Iacovelli A
Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Jun; 43(6):273-7. PubMed ID: 1922899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the role of education in women's knowledge and acceptance of adjunct high-risk human Papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening.
Papa D; Moore Simas TA; Reynolds M; Melnitsky H
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Apr; 13(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 19387125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cytological history of cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in France in 2006].
Boulanger JC; Fauvet R; Urrutiaguer S; Drean Y; Sevestre H; Ganry O; Bergeron C; Gondry J
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):764-71. PubMed ID: 17765001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of cervical cytological screening in the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka.
O'Dowd MJ; Grech ES; Tsirkina GA; Zeigler O
Med J Zambia; 1977; 11(4):117-21. PubMed ID: 919782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cervical cancer screening: current status and perspectives].
Petignat P; Bouchardy C; Sauthier P
Rev Med Suisse; 2006 May; 2(66):1308-9, 1311-2. PubMed ID: 16775991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
