These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23506596)

  • 21. Weighted 2 x 2 kappa coefficients: recommended indices of diagnostic accuracy for evidence-based practice.
    Gilchrist JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1045-53. PubMed ID: 19278830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combination of the weighted kappa coefficients of two binary diagnostic tests.
    Roldán-Nofuentes JA; Amro RM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):909-926. PubMed ID: 29172996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
    Rücker G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Joint hypothesis testing of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Youden index.
    Yin J; Mutiso F; Tian L
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):657-674. PubMed ID: 33511784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in paired designs.
    Nofuentes JA; Del Castillo Jde D
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4179-201. PubMed ID: 17357992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses.
    Suzuki S; Moro-oka T; Choudhry NK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):461-9. PubMed ID: 15196616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Youden index and Associated Cut-points for Three Ordinal Diagnostic Groups.
    Luo J; Xiong C
    Commun Stat Simul Comput; 2013 Jan; 42(6):1213-1234. PubMed ID: 23794784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.
    Qin G; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):613-22. PubMed ID: 16918927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
    Schulzer M
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. McNemar chi2 test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinations.
    Trajman A; Luiz RR
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2008; 68(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 18224558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of predictive values of two diagnostic tests from the same sample of subjects using weighted least squares.
    Wang W; Davis CS; Soong SJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2215-29. PubMed ID: 16220470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios.
    Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Diagnostic accuracy].
    Simundić AM
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
    Su CL; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
    Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On 'Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation'.
    Reiser B; Nakas CT
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):635-6. PubMed ID: 26776063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accounting for within-patient correlation in assessing relative sensitivity of an adjunctive diagnostic test: application to lung cancer.
    Scharfstein DO; Ryea JL; Caffo B
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2110-26. PubMed ID: 17943997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the non-inferiority of a diagnostic test based on paired observations.
    Lu Y; Jin H; Genant HK
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3029-44. PubMed ID: 12973785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Response to comment on 'Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation'.
    Chen F; Xue Y; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 26776064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.