These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23506727)

  • 1. Two-step minipercutaneous ureterolithotripsy under multimodal analgesia for complicated impacted calculi in proximal ureter.
    Aravantinos E; Anagnostou T; Samarinas M; Ioannides K; Ziavliakis K; Ntafos A; Melekos M
    Urology; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1147-52. PubMed ID: 23506727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy.
    Sun X; Xia S; Lu J; Liu H; Han B; Li W
    J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):913-7. PubMed ID: 18429682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percutaneous nephrostomy for removal of large impacted upper ureteral stones.
    Juan YS; Li CC; Shen JT; Huang CH; Chuang SM; Wang CJ; Wu WJ
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 23(8):412-6. PubMed ID: 17666308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid, economical treatment of large impacted calculi in the proximal ureter with ballistic ureteral lithotripsy and occlusive, percutaneous balloon catheter: the high pressure irrigation technique.
    Dellabella M; Milanese G; d'Anzeo G; Muzzonigro G
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):929-33; discussion 933-4. PubMed ID: 17632157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impacted upper-ureteral calculi >1 cm: blind access and totally tubeless percutaneous antegrade removal or retrograde approach?
    Karami H; Arbab AH; Hosseini SJ; Razzaghi MR; Simaei NR
    J Endourol; 2006 Sep; 20(9):616-9. PubMed ID: 16999610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure: a four-year retrospective study.
    Zhu H; Ye X; Xiao X; Chen X; Zhang Q; Wang H
    J Endourol; 2014 Jan; 28(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 23914784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experience of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones.
    Long Q; Guo J; Xu Z; Yang Y; Wang H; Zhu Y; Zhang Y; Wang G
    Urol Int; 2013; 90(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 23635397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy.
    Lopes Neto AC; Korkes F; Silva JL; Amarante RD; Mattos MH; Tobias-Machado M; Pompeo AC
    J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):164-8. PubMed ID: 22100003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Extracorporeal lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the treatment of calculi of the lower ureter].
    Netto Júnior NR; Claro JF
    Prog Urol; 1993 Feb; 3(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 8485594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilateral single-session ureteroscopy with pneumatic lithotripsy for bilateral ureter stones: feasible and safe.
    Gunlusoy B; Degirmenci T; Arslan M; Kozacioğlu Z; Nergiz N; Minareci S; Ayder AR
    Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 18758220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
    Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting the predictive factors for intra-operative complications of rigid ureteroscopy: a 15-year experience.
    Tanriverdi O; Silay MS; Kadihasanoglu M; Aydin M; Kendirci M; Miroglu C
    Urol J; 2012; 9(2):457-64. PubMed ID: 22641488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Transurethral lithotripsy with rigid and flexible ureteroscopy for renal and ureteral stones: results of the first 100 procedures].
    Takazawa R; Kitayama S; Kobayashi S; Araki S; Waseda Y; Hyochi N; Tsujii T
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2011 Aug; 57(8):411-6. PubMed ID: 21894076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open.
    Damiano R; Autorino R; Esposito C; Cantiello F; Sacco R; de Sio M; D'Armiento M
    Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):381-7; discussion 387-8. PubMed ID: 15306112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones?
    Muslumanoglu AY; Karadag MA; Tefekli AH; Altunrende F; Tok A; Berberoglu Y
    Int J Urol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1385-8. PubMed ID: 17083388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic.
    Eisner BH; Reese A; Sheth S; Stoller ML
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):165-8. PubMed ID: 19450856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management.
    Thomas JC; DeMarco RT; Donohoe JM; Adams MC; Brock JW; Pope JC
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):1072-4. PubMed ID: 16094060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-session ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for multiple stones.
    Takazawa R; Kitayama S; Tsujii T
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1118-21. PubMed ID: 22853010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones: why not?
    Osorio L; Lima E; Soares J; Autorino R; Versos R; Lhamas A; Marcelo F
    Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):27-31; discussion 31-3. PubMed ID: 17270606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi.
    Cohen J; Cohen S; Grasso M
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3 Pt B):E127-31. PubMed ID: 22757752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.