157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23507594)
1. [Long-term outcomes and complications of upper arm central venous access ports].
Ide Y; Mikami K; Murata K
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2013 Mar; 40(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23507594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.
Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.
Beckers MM; Ruven HJ; Seldenrijk CA; Prins MH; Biesma DH
Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 19640573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institute.
Mori Y; Nagayama S; Kawamura J; Hasegawa S; Tanaka E; Okabe H; Takeuchi M; Sonobe M; Matsumoto S; Kanai M; Muto M; Chiba T; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 21(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 26507141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports].
Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term Outcome of Peripherally Implanted Venous Access Ports in the Forearm in Female Cancer Patients.
Klösges L; Meyer C; Boschewitz J; Andersson M; Rudlowski C; Schild HH; Wilhelm K
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2015 Jun; 38(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 25209595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Totally implantable venous access ports: retrospective review of long-term complications in 81 patients.
Bassi KK; Giri AK; Pattanayak M; Abraham SW; Pandey KK
Indian J Cancer; 2012; 49(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 22842178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
Bodner LJ; Nosher JL; Patel KM; Siegel RL; Biswal R; Gribbin CE; Tokarz R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
Lorch H; Zwaan M; Kagel C; Weiss HD
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The late complications of totally implantable central venous access ports: the results from an Italian multicenter prospective observation study.
Dal Molin A; Rasero L; Guerretta L; Perfetti E; Clerico M
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 21167777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Complications associated with the placement of subcutaneous central venous access port devices: reasons for removal and complications observed].
Danno K; Ohnishi T; Watanabe A; Ueda M; Yanagawa T; Kim C; Fujita S; Fujita J; Yoshida T; Tono T; Monden T; Imaoka S
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2012 Nov; 39(12):2404-6. PubMed ID: 23268092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience with 100 consecutive central venous access arm ports placed by interventional radiologists.
Hills JR; Cardella JF; Cardella K; Waybill PN
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 9399467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients.
Bessoud B; de Baere T; Kuoch V; Desruennes E; Cosset MF; Lassau N; Roche A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 12540466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Higher complication risk of totally implantable venous access port systems in patients with advanced cancer - a single institution retrospective analysis.
Chang YF; Lo AC; Tsai CH; Lee PY; Sun S; Chang TH; Chen CC; Chang YS; Chen JR
Palliat Med; 2013 Feb; 27(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 22126844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Application of long term subcutaneously implanted access into the central veins system of "PORT" type in the Clinic of Pediatry, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology in Zabrze--15 year own observations].
Bucki B; Tomaszewska R; Bubała H; Sońta-Jakimczyk D; Karpe J; Stoksik P
Wiad Lek; 2009; 62(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 20141056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.
Funaki B; Szymski GX; Hackworth CA; Rosenblum JD; Burke R; Chang T; Leef JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1431-4. PubMed ID: 9353475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of normal saline versus heparinized saline solution for locking catheters of totally implantable long-term central vascular access devices in adult cancer patients.
Bertoglio S; Solari N; Meszaros P; Vassallo F; Bonvento M; Pastorino S; Bruzzi P
Cancer Nurs; 2012; 35(4):E35-42. PubMed ID: 22228390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcomes of radiologically placed arm ports.
Kaufman JA; Salamipour H; Geller SC; Rivitz SM; Waltman AC
Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):725-30. PubMed ID: 8939222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
