These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23508245)

  • 1. Vibrotactile sensory substitution for electromyographic control of object manipulation.
    Rombokas E; Stepp CE; Chang C; Malhotra M; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Aug; 60(8):2226-32. PubMed ID: 23508245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibrotactile feedback aids EMG control of object manipulation.
    Stepp CE; Chang C; Malhotra M; Matsuoka Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():1061-4. PubMed ID: 22254496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeated training with augmentative vibrotactile feedback increases object manipulation performance.
    Stepp CE; An Q; Matsuoka Y
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32743. PubMed ID: 22384283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-day training with vibrotactile feedback for virtual object manipulation.
    An Q; Matsuoka Y; Stepp CE
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975337. PubMed ID: 22275542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain activation during manipulation of the myoelectric prosthetic hand: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Maruishi M; Tanaka Y; Muranaka H; Tsuji T; Ozawa Y; Imaizumi S; Miyatani M; Kawahara J
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1604-11. PubMed ID: 15050584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Dec; 19(6):677-85. PubMed ID: 21984521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel concept for a prosthetic hand with a bidirectional interface: a feasibility study.
    Cipriani C; Antfolk C; Balkenius C; Rosén B; Lundborg G; Carrozza MC; Sebelius F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Nov; 56(11 Pt 2):2739-43. PubMed ID: 19758852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stiffness Feedback for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses Using Vibrotactile Stimulation.
    Witteveen HJ; Luft F; Rietman JS; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jan; 22(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 23799698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Jan; 20(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 21997322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisting versus repelling force-feedback for learning of a line following task in a wheelchair.
    Chen X; Agrawal SK
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Nov; 21(6):959-68. PubMed ID: 23475377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vibrotactile display coding for a balance prosthesis.
    Kadkade PP; Benda BJ; Schmidt PB; Wall C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 14960115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haptic feedback enhances grip force control of sEMG-controlled prosthetic hands in targeted reinnervation amputees.
    Kim K; Colgate JE
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Nov; 20(6):798-805. PubMed ID: 22855230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuro-physical rehabilitation by means of novel touch technologies.
    Confalonieri M; Tomasi P; Depaul M; Guandalini G; Baldessari M; Oss D; Prada F; Mazzalai A; Da Lio M; De Cecco M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 189():158-63. PubMed ID: 23739376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral demonstration of a somatosensory neuroprosthesis.
    Berg JA; Dammann JF; Tenore FV; Tabot GA; Boback JL; Manfredi LR; Peterson ML; Katyal KD; Johannes MS; Makhlin A; Wilcox R; Franklin RK; Vogelstein RJ; Hatsopoulos NG; Bensmaia SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 May; 21(3):500-7. PubMed ID: 23475375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
    Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of haptic degrees of freedom on task performance in virtual surgical environments.
    Forsslund J; Chan S; Selesnick J; Salisbury K; Silva RG; Blevins NH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 184():129-35. PubMed ID: 23400144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A brain-computer interface with vibrotactile biofeedback for haptic information.
    Chatterjee A; Aggarwal V; Ramos A; Acharya S; Thakor NV
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 4():40. PubMed ID: 17941986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tactile Feedback of Object Slip Facilitates Virtual Object Manipulation.
    Walker JM; Blank AA; Shewokis PA; OMalley MK
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2015; 8(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 25861087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A wearable vibrotactile system for distributed guidance in teleoperation and virtual environments.
    Bai D; Ju F; Qi F; Cao Y; Wang Y; Chen B
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Feb; 233(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 30595086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation.
    Stepp CE; Matsuoka Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2089-92. PubMed ID: 21095683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.