These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23508248)

  • 21. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Linear structures in mammographic images: detection and classification.
    Zwiggelaar R; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Taylor CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1077-86. PubMed ID: 15377116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
    Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
    Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
    Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance evaluation of functional medical imaging compression via optimal sampling schedule designs and cluster analysis.
    Chen Z; Feng DD; Cai W; Fulton R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 52(5):943-5. PubMed ID: 15887545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CADe for early detection of breast cancer-current status and why we need to continue to explore new approaches.
    Nishikawa RM; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1320-1. PubMed ID: 25086951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Real-time knowledge-based processing of images: application of the online NLPM method to perceptual visual analysis.
    Farrahi Moghaddam R; Cheriet M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Aug; 21(8):3390-404. PubMed ID: 22562761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visually weighted reconstruction of compressive sensing MRI.
    Oh H; Lee S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 32(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 24332887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Near-infrared laser computed tomography of the breast first clinical experience.
    Poellinger A; Martin JC; Ponder SL; Freund T; Hamm B; Bick U; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1545-53. PubMed ID: 19000871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
    Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms.
    Berber T; Alpkocak A; Balci P; Dicle O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23273502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial second-derivative image processing: an application to optical mammography to enhance the detection of breast tumors.
    Pera VE; Heffer EL; Siebold H; Schutz O; Heywang-Kobrunner S; Gotz L; Heinig A; Fantini S
    J Biomed Opt; 2003 Jul; 8(3):517-24. PubMed ID: 12880359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
    Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MRI to X-ray mammography registration using a volume-preserving affine transformation.
    Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Cardoso MJ; Zhang X; Tanner C; Ourselin S; Bick U; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Jul; 16(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 22513136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.