These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23508606)

  • 1. Should authors submit previous peer-review reports when submitting research papers? Views of general medical journal editors.
    Cals JW; Mallen CD; Glynn LG; Kotz D
    Ann Fam Med; 2013; 11(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 23508606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nursing Journal Policies on Disclosure and Management of Conflicts of Interest.
    Barnsteiner J; Shawn Kennedy M; Flanagin A; Sietmann C
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2020 Nov; 52(6):680-687. PubMed ID: 33078574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views.
    Chew M; Villanueva EV; Van Der Weyden MB
    J R Soc Med; 2007 Mar; 100(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 17339310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation criteria for publishing in top-tier journals in environmental health sciences and toxicology.
    Lee BM
    Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Jul; 119(7):896-9. PubMed ID: 21414890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e035600. PubMed ID: 32792429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS' VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE.
    Oehrlein EM; Graff JS; Perfetto EM; Mullins CD; Dubois RW; Anyanwu C; Onukwugha E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 29415784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
    Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review.
    Hamilton DG; Fraser H; Hoekstra R; Fidler F
    Elife; 2020 Nov; 9():. PubMed ID: 33211009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
    Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by Chinese journals of Traditional Chinese Medicine: a survey of journal editors and review of journals' instructions for authors.
    Ma B; Ke FY; Zheng EL; Yang ZX; Tang QN; Qi GQ
    Acupunct Med; 2016 Jun; 34(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 26738508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behind the curtain of
    Looi JC; Amos A; Bastiampillai T; Loi S; Miller E; Reutens S
    Australas Psychiatry; 2024 Oct; 32(5):411-414. PubMed ID: 39037398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
    Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.