BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23508606)

  • 1. Should authors submit previous peer-review reports when submitting research papers? Views of general medical journal editors.
    Cals JW; Mallen CD; Glynn LG; Kotz D
    Ann Fam Med; 2013; 11(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 23508606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nursing Journal Policies on Disclosure and Management of Conflicts of Interest.
    Barnsteiner J; Shawn Kennedy M; Flanagin A; Sietmann C
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2020 Nov; 52(6):680-687. PubMed ID: 33078574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views.
    Chew M; Villanueva EV; Van Der Weyden MB
    J R Soc Med; 2007 Mar; 100(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 17339310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation criteria for publishing in top-tier journals in environmental health sciences and toxicology.
    Lee BM
    Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Jul; 119(7):896-9. PubMed ID: 21414890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
    Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e035600. PubMed ID: 32792429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS' VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE.
    Oehrlein EM; Graff JS; Perfetto EM; Mullins CD; Dubois RW; Anyanwu C; Onukwugha E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 29415784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
    Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review.
    Hamilton DG; Fraser H; Hoekstra R; Fidler F
    Elife; 2020 Nov; 9():. PubMed ID: 33211009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
    Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
    BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
    Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by Chinese journals of Traditional Chinese Medicine: a survey of journal editors and review of journals' instructions for authors.
    Ma B; Ke FY; Zheng EL; Yang ZX; Tang QN; Qi GQ
    Acupunct Med; 2016 Jun; 34(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 26738508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
    Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
    Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Financial, nonfinancial and editors' conflicts of interest in high-impact biomedical journals.
    Bosch X; Pericas JM; Hernández C; Doti P
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2013 Jul; 43(7):660-7. PubMed ID: 23550719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.