These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23508679)

  • 1. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Mutlu MF; Erdem M; Erdem A; Yildiz S; Mutlu I; Arisoy O; Oktem M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2013 Jun; 30(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 23508679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
    Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive value of antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone: Which is better for live birth prediction in patients aged over 40 with their first IVF treatment?
    Lee Y; Kim TH; Park JK; Eum JH; Lee HJ; Kim J; Lyu SW; Kim YS; Lee WS; Yoon TK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():151-155. PubMed ID: 29306180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; Eijkemans MJC; Mochtar MH; van Golde RJT; Hoek A; Kuchenbecker WKH; Fleischer K; de Bruin JP; Groen H; van Wely M; Lambalk CB; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 32(12):2485-2495. PubMed ID: 29121350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials.
    Nelson SM; Klein BM; Arce JC
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):923-930.e1. PubMed ID: 25624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH.
    Lan VT; Linh NK; Tuong HM; Wong PC; Howles CM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 23953069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve Tests and Age in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation-A Real-World Data Analysis of 89,002 Patients.
    Wang X; Jin L; Mao YD; Shi JZ; Huang R; Jiang YN; Zhang CL; Liang XY
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():702061. PubMed ID: 34526967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive value of anti-müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET.
    Tsakos E; Tolikas A; Daniilidis A; Asimakopoulos B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 25001569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a strong predictor of live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology.
    Lukaszuk K; Liss J; Kunicki M; Jakiel G; Wasniewski T; Woclawek-Potocka I; Pastuszek E
    Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 14(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 25152514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive values of anti-müllerian hormone, antral follicle count and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) for assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
    Ashrafi M; Hemat M; Arabipoor A; Salman Yazdi R; Bahman-Abadi A; Cheraghi R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 27976974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of ovarian reserve parameters for predicting live births in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Lukaszuk K; Kunicki M; Liss J; Lukaszuk M; Jakiel G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 23485092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hormonal and functional biomarkers in ovarian response.
    Vural B; Cakiroglu Y; Vural F; Filiz S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 289(6):1355-61. PubMed ID: 24366586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial.
    Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of baseline antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone in prediction of cumulative live birth in the first in vitro fertilisation cycle: a retrospective cohort analysis.
    Li HW; Lee VC; Lau EY; Yeung WS; Ho PC; Ng EH
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61095. PubMed ID: 23637787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone is a better predictor than basal follicle stimulating hormone of successful blastocysts development during IVF treatment.
    Sadruddin S; Barnett B; Ku L; Havemann D; Mucowski S; Herrington R; Burggren W
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239779. PubMed ID: 33044971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ovarian response and cumulative live birth rate of women undergoing in-vitro fertilisation who had discordant anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count measurements: a retrospective study.
    Li HW; Lee VC; Lau EY; Yeung WS; Ho PC; Ng EH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e108493. PubMed ID: 25313856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing four ovarian reserve markers--associations with ovarian response and live births after assisted reproduction.
    Brodin T; Hadziosmanovic N; Berglund L; Olovsson M; Holte J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Oct; 94(10):1056-63. PubMed ID: 26184379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anti-Mullerian hormone is a better marker than inhibin B, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol or antral follicle count in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
    Kunt C; Ozaksit G; Keskin Kurt R; Cakir Gungor AN; Kanat-Pektas M; Kilic S; Dede A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21562964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study.
    Leijdekkers JA; Eijkemans MJC; van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; McLernon DJ; Bhattacharya S; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1684-1695. PubMed ID: 30085143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discordant anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): which one is the better predictor for live birth?
    Wang S; Zhang Y; Mensah V; Huber WJ; Huang YT; Alvero R
    J Ovarian Res; 2018 Jul; 11(1):60. PubMed ID: 30012195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.