These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

889 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23509878)

  • 41. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
    Whitmal NA; DeMaio D; Lin R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 17485980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
    van Besouw RM; Forrester L; Crowe ND; Rowan D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
    Li T; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An Examination of Sources of Variability Across the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Test in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Bierer JA; Spindler E; Bierer SM; Wright R
    Trends Hear; 2016 May; 20():. PubMed ID: 27194155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Neurophysiological Study of Musical Pitch Identification in Mandarin-Speaking Cochlear Implant Users.
    Cai J; Liu Y; Yao M; Xu M; Zhang H
    Neural Plast; 2020; 2020():4576729. PubMed ID: 32774355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Music perception improves in children with bilateral cochlear implants or bimodal devices.
    Polonenko MJ; Giannantonio S; Papsin BC; Marsella P; Gordon KA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4494. PubMed ID: 28679263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.
    Limb CJ
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16974148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Olszewski C; Rychener M; Sena K; Knutson JF; Witt S; Macpherson B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15937406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants.
    Laneau J; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 16219993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early-implanted children: the role of auditory working memory and musical activities.
    Torppa R; Faulkner A; Huotilainen M; Järvikivi J; Lipsanen J; Laasonen M; Vainio M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 24460045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Leal MC; Shin YJ; Laborde ML; Calmels MN; Verges S; Lugardon S; Andrieu S; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Sep; 123(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 14575398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Won JH; Drennan WR; Kang RS; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):796-805. PubMed ID: 20595901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users.
    Brockmeier SJ; Fitzgerald D; Searle O; Fitzgerald H; Grasmeder M; Hilbig S; Vermiere K; Peterreins M; Heydner S; Arnold W
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21756454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.