150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23510692)
1. A comparison of additional treatment processes to limit particle accumulation and microbial growth during drinking water distribution.
Liu G; Lut MC; Verberk JQ; Van Dijk JC
Water Res; 2013 May; 47(8):2719-28. PubMed ID: 23510692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial communities in unchlorinated drinking water distribution system: an integral study of bulk water, suspended solids, loose deposits, and pipe wall biofilm.
Liu G; Bakker GL; Li S; Vreeburg JH; Verberk JQ; Medema GJ; Liu WT; Van Dijk JC
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 May; 48(10):5467-76. PubMed ID: 24766451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bacteriology of drinking water distribution systems: an integral and multidimensional review.
Liu G; Verberk JQ; Van Dijk JC
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2013 Nov; 97(21):9265-76. PubMed ID: 24068335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of anionic fluidized ion exchange (FIX) pre-treatment on nanofiltration (NF) membrane fouling.
Cornelissen ER; Chasseriaud D; Siegers WG; Beerendonk EF; van der Kooij D
Water Res; 2010 May; 44(10):3283-93. PubMed ID: 20381111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biopolymer fouling in dead-end ultrafiltration of treated domestic wastewater.
Zheng X; Ernst M; Huck PM; Jekel M
Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5212-21. PubMed ID: 20637488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial groundwater treatment: biofilm activity and organic carbon removal performance.
Långmark J; Storey MV; Ashbolt NJ; Stenström TA
Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):740-8. PubMed ID: 14723944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New process for alleviation of membrane fouling of modified hybrid MBR system for advanced domestic wastewater treatment.
Shuo L; Baozhen W; Hongjun H; Yanping L
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):2059-66. PubMed ID: 19039188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimisation and significance of ATP analysis for measuring active biomass in granular activated carbon filters used in water treatment.
Magic-Knezev A; van der Kooij D
Water Res; 2004 Nov; 38(18):3971-9. PubMed ID: 15380987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the role of feed water constituents in irreversible membrane fouling of pilot-scale ultrafiltration drinking water treatment systems.
Peiris RH; Jaklewicz M; Budman H; Legge RL; Moresoli C
Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3364-74. PubMed ID: 23615336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbial community structure and biomass in developing drinking water biofilms.
Keinänen MM; Martikainen PJ; Kontro MH
Can J Microbiol; 2004 Mar; 50(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 15105885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct quantification of bacterial biomass in influent, effluent and activated sludge of wastewater treatment plants by using flow cytometry.
Foladori P; Bruni L; Tamburini S; Ziglio G
Water Res; 2010 Jul; 44(13):3807-18. PubMed ID: 20537673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Hinrichs C; Van der Meer WG; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
Biofouling; 2009; 25(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 19437193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elucidation and control of biofilm formation processes in water treatment and distribution using the Unified Biofilm Approach.
van der Kooij D; Vrouwenvelder JS; Veenendaal HR
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):83-90. PubMed ID: 12701911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow-cytometric total bacterial cell counts as a descriptive microbiological parameter for drinking water treatment processes.
Hammes F; Berney M; Wang Y; Vital M; Köster O; Egli T
Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17659762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Water quality characterization in real biofilm wastewater treatment systems by particle size distribution.
García-Mesa JJ; Poyatos JM; Delgado-Ramos F; Muñio MM; Osorio F; Hontoria E
Bioresour Technol; 2010 Nov; 101(21):8038-45. PubMed ID: 20624601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of ultrafiltration membrane process combined with coagulation/sedimentation.
Jang NY; Watanabe Y; Minegishi S
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):209-19. PubMed ID: 16003980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
