BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2351092)

  • 1. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials.
    Wee AS; Ashley RA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anodal block: can this occur during routine nerve conduction studies?
    Wee AS; Leis AA; Kuhn AR; Gilbert RW
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000; 40(7):387-91. PubMed ID: 11142109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Study on the latency difference between compound muscle and sensory nerve action potentials].
    Hasegawa O; Gondo G; Wada N; Matsumoto S; Mimura E
    No To Shinkei; 2001 Jun; 53(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 11436338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential.
    Barkhaus PE; Periquet MI; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface compound action potentials recorded from different locations on the anterior tibial muscle.
    Wee AS
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 42(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 11938594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of reference electrode to the compound muscle action potential.
    Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Jul; 36(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 17455266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Characteristics of electrical discharges by transcranial cortex stimulation activated motor units of the hand muscles of the human].
    Hess CW; Mills KR; Murray NM
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1988 Dec; 19(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 3145182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of the reference electrode on the compound muscle action potential of the flexor digiti minimi brevis.
    Takahashi N; Robinson LR
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 89(7):570-5. PubMed ID: 20463563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of different types of surface electrodes on amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential.
    Jonas D; Bischoff C; Conrad B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2171-5. PubMed ID: 10616123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compound motor action potential interexaminer variability in photoguided placement of the recording electrodes.
    Axelson HW
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 29(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 22659720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Muscle compound motor action potentials from esophago-vertebral electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in the normal awake man.
    Caccia MR; Valla PL; Osio M; Mangoni A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 39(8):493-501. PubMed ID: 10627936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new electrode placement for recording the compound motor action potential of the first dorsal interosseous muscle.
    Seror P; Maisonobe T; Bouche P
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2011 Oct; 41(4):173-80. PubMed ID: 22078729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CMAP variability as a function of electrode site and size.
    van Dijk JG; Tjon-a-Tsien A; van der Kamp W
    Muscle Nerve; 1995 Jan; 18(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 7800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recording characteristics of monopolar EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 2000101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the best electrode position for recording of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential.
    Dionne A; Parkes A; Engler B; Watson BV; Nicolle MW
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Jul; 40(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19533636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of electric and magnetic coil stimulation in the supraclavicular region.
    Cros D; Gominak S; Shahani B; Fang J; Day B
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 May; 15(5):587-90. PubMed ID: 1584250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Branched EMG electrodes for stable and selective recording of single motor unit potentials in humans.
    Christova L; Stephanova D; Kossev A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 17313346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recording characteristics of the surface EMG electrodes.
    Barkhaus PE; Nandedkar SD
    Muscle Nerve; 1994 Nov; 17(11):1317-23. PubMed ID: 7935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of surgical outcome for proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy novel mode of assessment using compound action potentials of deltoid and biceps brachii and central motor conduction time.
    Imajo Y; Kato Y; Kanchiku T; Suzuki H; Yoshida Y; Funaba M; Taguchi T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(23):E1444-9. PubMed ID: 22895483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.