506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23510970)
1. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How accurately can subject-specific finite element models predict strains and strength of human femora? Investigation using full-field measurements.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):802-806. PubMed ID: 26944687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical comparison and evaluation of human proximal femurs modeling via different devices and FEM analysis.
Verim Ö; Taşgetiren S; Er MS; Timur M; Yuran AF
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):e19-24. PubMed ID: 22711421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of digital image correlation for measurement of surface strains in composite long bones.
Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Zadpoor AA; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1928-32. PubMed ID: 23791085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.
Yosibash Z; Tal D; Trabelsi N
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2707-23. PubMed ID: 20439270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Validated Open-Source Multisolver Fourth-Generation Composite Femur Model.
MacLeod AR; Rose H; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27618586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations.
Yosibash Z; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C
J Biomech; 2007; 40(16):3688-99. PubMed ID: 17706228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur.
Langton CM; Pisharody S; Keyak JH
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jul; 31(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 19230742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of bone strength by μCT and MDCT-based finite-element-models: how much spatial resolution is needed?
Bauer JS; Sidorenko I; Mueller D; Baum T; Issever AS; Eckstein F; Rummeny EJ; Link TM; Raeth CW
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e36-42. PubMed ID: 24274992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental validation of a finite element model of the proximal femur using digital image correlation and a composite bone model.
Dickinson AS; Taylor AC; Ozturk H; Browne M
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jan; 133(1):014504. PubMed ID: 21186906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are DXA/aBMD and QCT/FEA Stiffness and Strength Estimates Sensitive to Sex and Age?
Rezaei A; Giambini H; Rossman T; Carlson KD; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; Dragomir-Daescu D
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Dec; 45(12):2847-2856. PubMed ID: 28940110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy from stress tensors.
Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jan; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24777672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of subject-specific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur.
Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z; Milgrom C
J Biomech; 2009 Feb; 42(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 19118831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the linear finite element prediction of deformation and strain of human cancellous bone to 3D digital volume correlation measurements.
Zauel R; Yeni YN; Bay BK; Dong XN; Fyhrie DP
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 16532610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
