These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2351121)

  • 1. Quantitative predictability of carcinogenicity of the covalent binding index of chemicals to DNA: comparison of the in vivo and in vitro assays.
    Taningher M; Saccomanno G; Santi L; Grilli S; Parodi S
    Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Mar; 84():183-92. PubMed ID: 2351121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative correlation between carcinogenicity and sister chromatid exchange induction in vivo for a group of 11 N-nitroso derivatives.
    Parodi S; Zunino A; Ottaggio L; De Ferrari M; Santi L
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1983 Mar; 11(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 6842616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative predictivity of carcinogenicity of the autoradiographic repair test (primary hepatocyte cultures) for a group of 80 chemicals belonging to different chemical classes.
    Bolognesi C; Taningher M; Parodi S; Santi L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1986 Dec; 70():247-53. PubMed ID: 3830111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting rodent carcinogenicity using potency measures of the in vitro sister chromatid exchange and chromosome aberration assays.
    Schildcrout JS; Margolin BH; Zeiger E
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 10037324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative predictivity of carcinogenicity for four short-term parameters, evaluated in rat liver: alkaline DNA fragmentation, autoradiographic repair, DNA adducts, preneoplastic nodules.
    Parodi S; Taningher M; Santi L
    Folia Biol (Praha); 1984; 30 Spec No():145-54. PubMed ID: 6724053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NTP technical report on the toxicity and metabolism studies of chloral hydrate (CAS No. 302-17-0). Administered by gavage to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice.
    Beland FA
    Toxic Rep Ser; 1999 Aug; (59):1-66, A1-E7. PubMed ID: 11803702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo covalent binding of chemicals to DNA as a short-term test for carcinogenicity.
    Lutz WK; Schlatter C
    Arch Toxicol Suppl; 1979; (2):411-5. PubMed ID: 288355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the standard and reduced pH Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell in vitro transformation assays in predicting the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
    Isfort RJ; Kerckaert GA; LeBoeuf RA
    Mutat Res; 1996 Sep; 356(1):11-63. PubMed ID: 8841474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative predictivity of the transformation in vitro assay compared with the Ames test.
    Parodi S; Taningher M; Russo P; Pala M; Vecchio D; Fassina G; Santi L
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1983; 12(4-6):483-510. PubMed ID: 6668607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of hepatocarcinogen-induced gene expression profiles in conventional primary rat hepatocytes with in vivo rat liver.
    Doktorova TY; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; van Delft J; Kleinjans J; Ahr HJ; Rogiers V
    Arch Toxicol; 2012 Sep; 86(9):1399-411. PubMed ID: 22484513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mutagenicity in V79 cells does not correlate with carcinogenity in small rodents for 12 aromatic amines.
    Fassina G; Abbondandolo A; Mariani L; Taningher M; Parodi S
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1990; 29(1):109-30. PubMed ID: 2299684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive assay for rodent carcinogenicity using in vivo biochemical parameters: operational characteristics and complementarity.
    Kitchin KT; Brown JL; Kulkarni AP
    Mutat Res; 1992 Apr; 266(2):253-72. PubMed ID: 1373835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo covalent binding of organic chemicals to DNA as a quantitative indicator in the process of chemical carcinogenesis.
    Lutz WK
    Mutat Res; 1979 Dec; 65(4):289-356. PubMed ID: 390383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Covalent binding of drug metabolites to DNA--a tool of predictive value?
    Bolt HM; Laib RJ
    Arch Toxicol; 1980 Nov; 46(1-2):171-80. PubMed ID: 7235993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of genetic toxicity patterns of carcinogens and noncarcinogens: strategies for predictive use of short-term assays.
    Tennant RW; Spalding JW; Stasiewicz S; Caspary WD; Mason JM; Resnick MA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1987 Nov; 75():87-95. PubMed ID: 3319571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of rodent carcinogenesis: an evaluation of prechronic liver lesions as forecasters of liver tumors in NTP carcinogenicity studies.
    Allen DG; Pearse G; Haseman JK; Maronpot RR
    Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 15307212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutive and carcinogen-derived DNA binding as a basis for the assessment of potency of chemical carcinogens.
    Lutz WK
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 1981; 136 Pt B():1349-65. PubMed ID: 7344514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.