These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2351202)

  • 1. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study.
    Jakobsson SO; Paulin G
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 2351202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1--Skeletal changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Feb; 17(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2310738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H; Fackel U
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 2351206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Hägg U; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Aug; 10(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 3181295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
    McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentofacial growth in orthodontically treated and untreated children with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). A comparison with Angle Class II division 1 subjects.
    Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S; Thilander B
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):357-73. PubMed ID: 8529749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 3863486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.
    Teuscher U
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):258-75. PubMed ID: 281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Baltromejus S; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Feb; 71(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11211297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Colagrossi S
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15222715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mandibular propulsion in the treatment of Class II division I by activators: comparison with growth predictions].
    Bonnefont R; Charron C
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1979 Jan; 13(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 394264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions.
    Wieslander L; Lagerström L
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 283692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.