These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Pure associative tactile agnosia for the left hand: clinical and anatomo-functional correlations. Veronelli L; Ginex V; Dinacci D; Cappa SF; Corbo M Cortex; 2014 Sep; 58():206-16. PubMed ID: 25046697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition. Woods AT; O'Modhrain S; Newell FN Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 15460932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity. Kafkas A; Montaldi D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1971-89. PubMed ID: 21838656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cortical activity during tactile exploration of objects in blind and sighted humans. Amedi A; Raz N; Azulay H; Malach R; Zohary E Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 20404404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality? Casey SJ; Newell FN Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 16597451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Eye tracking infants: investigating the role of attention during learning on recognition memory. Taylor G; Herbert JS Scand J Psychol; 2013 Feb; 54(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 23198776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Transsaccadic memory for visual object detail. De Graef P; Verfaillie K Prog Brain Res; 2002; 140():181-96. PubMed ID: 12508590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Individual differences in face memory and eye fixation patterns during face learning. Sekiguchi T Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21354541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. How visual and semantic information influence learning in familiar contexts. Goujon A; Brockmole JR; Ehinger KA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1315-27. PubMed ID: 22612057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Serial exploration of faces: comparing vision and touch. Dopjans L; Bülthoff HH; Wallraven C J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22235145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Foulsham T; Underwood G J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):6.1-17. PubMed ID: 18318632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The effects of different aperture-viewing conditions on the recognition of novel objects. Króliczak G; Goodale MA; Humphrey GK Perception; 2003; 32(10):1169-79. PubMed ID: 14700252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Optimal and preferred eye landing positions in objects and scenes. Foulsham T; Kingstone A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1707-28. PubMed ID: 23398283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Similarity dependency of the change in ERP component N1 accompanying with the object recognition learning. Tokudome W; Wang G Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 22115890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]