These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23516064)

  • 1. Does footprint depth correlate with foot motion and pressure?
    Bates KT; Savage R; Pataky TC; Morse SA; Webster E; Falkingham PL; Ren L; Qian Z; Collins D; Bennett MR; McClymont J; Crompton RH
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Jun; 10(83):20130009. PubMed ID: 23516064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between plantar pressure and footprint shape.
    Hatala KG; Dingwall HL; Wunderlich RE; Richmond BG
    J Hum Evol; 2013 Jul; 65(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23725794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting locomotor biomechanics from the morphology of human footprints.
    Hatala KG; Wunderlich RE; Dingwall HL; Richmond BG
    J Hum Evol; 2016 Jan; 90():38-48. PubMed ID: 26767958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking.
    Jonely H; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; James CR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21632159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the Foot Posture Index or their individual criteria predict dynamic plantar pressures?
    Sánchez-Rodríguez R; Martínez-Nova A; Escamilla-Martínez E; Pedrera-Zamorano JD
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 22727718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of gastrocnemius-soleus muscle in forefoot force transmission at heel rise - A 3D finite element analysis.
    Chen WM; Park J; Park SB; Shim VP; Lee T
    J Biomech; 2012 Jun; 45(10):1783-9. PubMed ID: 22578743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of standing fleshed foot and walking and jumping bare footprint measurements.
    Howsam N; Bridgen A
    Sci Justice; 2018 Sep; 58(5):346-354. PubMed ID: 30193660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plantar pressure sensors indicate women to have a significantly higher peak pressure on the hallux, toes, forefoot, and medial of the foot compared to men.
    Yamamoto T; Hoshino Y; Kanzaki N; Nukuto K; Yamashita T; Ibaraki K; Nagamune K; Nagai K; Araki D; Matsushita T; Kuroda R
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 Jul; 13(1):40. PubMed ID: 32611444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normal Values of Pressures and Foot Areas Measured in the Static Condition.
    Lalande X; Vie B; Weber JP; Jammes Y
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2016 Jul; 106(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 27489967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laetoli footprints reveal bipedal gait biomechanics different from those of modern humans and chimpanzees.
    Hatala KG; Demes B; Richmond BG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Aug; 283(1836):. PubMed ID: 27488647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of foot orthoses with forefoot cushioning or metatarsal pad on forefoot peak plantar pressure in running.
    Hähni M; Hirschmüller A; Baur H
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2016; 9():44. PubMed ID: 27891180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of focused-rigidity casts on forefoot plantar pressures: a pilot investigation.
    Dagg AR; Chockalingam N; Branthwaite H
    J Wound Care; 2013 May; 22(5):237-8, 240-3. PubMed ID: 23702720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimentally generated footprints in sand: Analysis and consequences for the interpretation of fossil and forensic footprints.
    D'Août K; Meert L; Van Gheluwe B; De Clercq D; Aerts P
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Apr; 141(4):515-25. PubMed ID: 19927372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of footprint measurements with plantar kinetics: a linear regression model.
    Fascione JM; Crews RT; Wrobel JS
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 24725031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomical masking of pressure footprints based on the Oxford Foot Model: validation and clinical relevance.
    Giacomozzi C; Stebbins JA
    Gait Posture; 2017 Mar; 53():131-138. PubMed ID: 28157574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of eliminating leg length difference on plantar foot pressure distribution in patients wearing forefoot offloading shoe.
    Palmanovich E; Ayalon M; Sira DB; Nyska M; Hetsroni I
    Foot (Edinb); 2017 Dec; 33():39-43. PubMed ID: 29126041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of foot progression angle on the distribution of plantar pressure in normal children.
    Lai YC; Lin HS; Pan HF; Chang WN; Hsu CJ; Renn JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Feb; 29(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 24342455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed(®) M system.
    Tong JW; Kong PW
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 23266249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender and age impact on plantar pressure distribution in early adolescence.
    Demirbüken İ; Özgül B; Timurtaş E; Yurdalan SU; Çekin MD; Polat MG
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2019 May; 53(3):215-220. PubMed ID: 30905625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical model of the human foot: kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking.
    Scott SH; Winter DA
    J Biomech; 1993 Sep; 26(9):1091-1104. PubMed ID: 8408091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.