133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2351727)
1. Evaluation of direct wet mount parasitological examination of preserved fecal specimens.
Neimeister R; Logan AL; Egleton JH; Kleger B
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 May; 28(5):1082-4. PubMed ID: 2351727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examination of preserved stool specimens for parasites: lack of value of the direct wet mount.
Estevez EG; Levine JA
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 22(4):666-7. PubMed ID: 2416772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a new system for the fixation, concentration, and staining of intestinal parasites in fecal specimens, with critical observations on the trichrome stain.
Amin OM
J Microbiol Methods; 2000 Jan; 39(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 10576702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trichrome staining for detection of intestinal protozoa a better screening method.
Agrawal N; Sharma U; Sharma AK
J Commun Dis; 2006 Dec; 38(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 17913212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Streck tissue fixative, a nonformalin fixative for preservation of stool samples and subsequent parasitologic examination.
Nace EK; Steurer FJ; Eberhard ML
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Dec; 37(12):4113-9. PubMed ID: 10565940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct wet mounts versus concentration for routine parasitological examination: are both necessary?
Watson B; Blitzer M; Rubin H; Nachamkin I
Am J Clin Pathol; 1988 Mar; 89(3):389-91. PubMed ID: 3348174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of a modified zinc sulfate flotation technique.
Bartlett MS; Harper K; Smith N; Verbanac P; Smith JW
J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):524-8. PubMed ID: 566767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of formalin-acetone sedimentation in the concentration of stool for intestinal parasites.
Parija SC; Bhattacharya S; Padhan P; Shivaprakash MR
Trop Doct; 2003 Jul; 33(3):163-4. PubMed ID: 12870605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Viewpoint: the neglect of stool microscopy for intestinal parasites and possible solutions.
Parija SC; Srinivasa H
Trop Med Int Health; 1999 Jul; 4(7):522-4. PubMed ID: 10470345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Examination of feces for the detection of parasites. A comparison of 2 methods].
McClure E; García A; Trujillo J; Bawden M
Rev Med Panama; 1984 Sep; 9(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 6494506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Glycerol Jelly (GJ) mount: a new and simple method for routine stool examination using a modified glycerol jelly reagent.
Abdel-Hamid MY
J Egypt Soc Parasitol; 2001 Aug; 31(2):617-26. PubMed ID: 11478460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sodium azide: ineffective as a faecal preservative for parasitological diagnosis.
Wahlquist SP; Eberhard ML
Ann Trop Med Parasitol; 1991 Jun; 85(3):365-8. PubMed ID: 1746987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of pooled formalin-preserved fecal specimens with three individual samples for detection of intestinal parasites.
Aldeen WE; Shisenant J; Hale D; Matsen J; Carroll K
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jan; 31(1):144-5. PubMed ID: 8417020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a single slide trichrome-stained concentrate for the detection of intestinal parasites. Stained concentration procedure for ova and parasites.
Hale DC; Carroll K; Kucera JR; Aldeen WE
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Aug; 106(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8712169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of direct wet mount and trichrome staining techniques for detecting Entamoeba species trophozoites in stools.
Gardner BB; Del Junco DJ; Fenn J; Hengesbaugh JH
J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):656-8. PubMed ID: 6168649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of commercially available preservatives for laboratory detection of helminths and protozoa in human fecal specimens.
Pietrzak-Johnston SM; Bishop H; Wahlquist S; Moura H; Da Silva ND; Da Silva SP; Nguyen-Dinh P
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 May; 38(5):1959-64. PubMed ID: 10790128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Parasitological evaluation of the stool].
Banse V; Gigi J; Verstraeten L; Wauters G
Acta Clin Belg; 1993; 48(5):307-15. PubMed ID: 8291339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Distribution of intestinal parasites detected in the parasitology laboratory of the Ege University Medical School Hospital, in 2005].
Değirmenci A; Sevil N; Güneş K; Yolasiğmaz A; Turgay N
Turkiye Parazitol Derg; 2007; 31(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 17594655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative parasitological stool studies using the methods of Kato & Miura, Lawless, Heine and BIOSEPAR].
Krause W
Appl Parasitol; 1994 Feb; 35(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 8173586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the FeKal CON-Trate system with the formalin-ethyl acetate technique for detection of intestinal parasites.
Long EG; Tsin AT; Robinson BA
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):210-1. PubMed ID: 4031035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
