These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
789 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23517833)
1. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention. Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study. Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection. Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography. Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound. Kim SJ; Lee H; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Jang IK Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study. Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Serial assessment of vessel interactions after drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected distal left main coronary artery disease using frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Fujino Y; Attizzani GF; Bezerra HG; Wang W; Tahara S; Yamamoto H; Chamie D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Takagi K; Nakamura S; Costa MA JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1035-45. PubMed ID: 24156964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model. Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of tissue prolapse with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound after drug-eluting stent implantation. Sohn J; Hur SH; Kim IC; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Nam CW; Kim YN; Kim KB Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 31(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25273918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra-stent tissue evaluation within bare metal and drug-eluting stents > 3 years since implantation in patients with mild to moderate neointimal proliferation using optical coherence tomography and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Kitabata H; Loh JP; Pendyala LK; Omar A; Ota H; Minha S; Magalhaes MA; Torguson R; Chen F; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Apr; 15(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 24767313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries). Ormiston J; Webster M; Stewart J; Vrolix M; Whitbourn R; Donohoe D; Knape C; Lansky A; Attizzani GF; Fitzgerald P; Kandzari DE; Wijns W JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1026-34. PubMed ID: 24055443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors for functionally significant in-stent restenosis: an integrated analysis using coronary angiography, IVUS, and myocardial perfusion imaging. Kang SJ; Cho YR; Park GM; Ahn JM; Han SB; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1183-90. PubMed ID: 24229771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo comparison of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasonography. Ramesh S; Papayannis A; Abdel-karim AR; Banerjee S; Brilakis E J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 24(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 22388302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multimodality imaging of attenuated plaque using grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography. Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 25511369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW; Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]