These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2351802)

  • 1. Clinical and radiological evaluation of Vertebrace extrication collars.
    Solot JA; Winzelberg GG
    J Emerg Med; 1990; 8(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 2351802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: roentgenographic and goniometric method of study.
    Fisher SV; Bowar JF; Awad EA; Gullickson G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1977 Mar; 58(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 843201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. A comparison study.
    Askins V; Eismont FJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 9201855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two new immobilization collars.
    Rosen PB; McSwain NE; Arata M; Stahl S; Mercer D
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1189-95. PubMed ID: 1416295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical immobilization in trauma patients: soft collars better than rigid collars? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bäcker HC; Elias P; Braun KF; Johnson MA; Turner P; Cunningham J
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Dec; 31(12):3378-3391. PubMed ID: 36181555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of methods of cervical immobilization used in patient extrication and transport.
    Cline JR; Scheidel E; Bigsby EF
    J Trauma; 1985 Jul; 25(7):649-53. PubMed ID: 4009770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
    Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
    Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of neck movement in the soft cervical collar and rigid cervical brace in healthy subjects.
    Whitcroft KL; Massouh L; Amirfeyz R; Bannister GC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Feb; 34(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 21334544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of current extrication orthoses in immobilization of the unstable cervical spine.
    McGuire RA; Degnan G; Amundson GM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1990 Oct; 15(10):1064-7. PubMed ID: 2263973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses.
    Chin KR; Auerbach JD; Adams SB; Sodl JF; Riew KD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16481953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars.
    Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Del Rossi G; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1609-13. PubMed ID: 22695429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A radiographic comparison of prehospital cervical immobilization methods.
    Graziano AF; Scheidel EA; Cline JR; Baer LJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1987 Oct; 16(10):1127-31. PubMed ID: 3662158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Nebraska collar, a new prototype cervical immobilization collar, with three standard models.
    Alberts LR; Mahoney CR; Neff JR
    J Orthop Trauma; 1998 Aug; 12(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 9715451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How effective is the Newport/Aspen collar? A prospective radiographic evaluation in healthy adult volunteers.
    Hughes SJ
    J Trauma; 1998 Aug; 45(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 9715199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical Spine Motion During Vehicle Extrication of Healthy Volunteers.
    Gabrieli A; Nardello F; Geronazzo M; Marchetti P; Liberto A; Arcozzi D; Polati E; Cesari P; Zamparo P
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2020; 24(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 31750763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of cervical collars and verbal instructions in minimising spinal movement during self-extrication following a motor vehicle collision - a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers.
    Nutbeam T; Fenwick R; May B; Stassen W; Smith JE; Wallis L; Dayson M; Shippen J
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 29(1):108. PubMed ID: 34332623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.