These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23518207)

  • 1. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA.
    Ferreira MB; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Hipólito AC; Assunção WG
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():92-9. PubMed ID: 24411356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Faverani LP; Barão VA; Ramalho-Ferreira G; Delben JA; Ferreira MB; Garcia Júnior IR; Assunção WG
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Apr; 37():164-70. PubMed ID: 24582236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA.
    Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Nov; 92(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 18783845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
    dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses With Different Prosthetic Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis.
    Arinc H
    Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 29517641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution.
    Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 19076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.
    Eraslan R; Yagci F; Esim E
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):348-357. PubMed ID: 37950537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis.
    Güçlü ZB; Gürbüz A; Deste Gökay G; Durkan R; Oyar P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Oct; 67(5):419-428. PubMed ID: 35972416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Silico Mechanical Effort Analysis of the All-On-4 Design Performed With Platform-Switching Distal Short Dental Implants.
    Santana LCL; Idogava HT; De Foggi CC; Guastaldi FPS; Noritomi PY; Dos Reis BA; Vaz LG
    J Biomech Eng; 2023 Sep; 145(9):. PubMed ID: 37195691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.