128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23518218)
1. Two-year follow-up of the NEVO ResElution-I(NEVO RES-I) trial: a randomised, multicentre comparison of the NEVO sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions.
Abizaid A; Ormiston JA; Fajadet J; Mauri L; Schofer J; Verheye S; Dens J; Thuesen L; Macours N; Qureshi AC; Spaulding C;
EuroIntervention; 2013 Oct; 9(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 23518218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intravascular ultrasound results from the NEVO ResElution-I trial: a randomized, blinded comparison of sirolimus-eluting NEVO stents with paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Liberté stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.
Otake H; Honda Y; Courtney BK; Shimohama T; Ako J; Waseda K; Macours N; Rogers C; Popma JJ; Abizaid A; Ormiston JA; Spaulding C; Cohen SA; Fitzgerald PJ
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 21386089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six-month results of the NEVO Res-Elution I (NEVO RES-I) trial: a randomized, multicenter comparison of the NEVO sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary artery lesions.
Ormiston JA; Abizaid A; Spertus J; Fajadet J; Mauri L; Schofer J; Verheye S; Dens J; Thuesen L; Dubois C; Hoffmann R; Wijns W; Fitzgerald PJ; Popma JJ; Macours N; Cebrian A; Stoll HP; Rogers C; Spaulding C;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Dec; 3(6):556-64. PubMed ID: 21062998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent compared with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 2-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV trial (Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Taxus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
Leon MB; Kandzari DE; Eisenstein EL; Anstrom KJ; Mauri L; Cutlip DE; Nikolsky E; O'Shaughnessy C; Overlie PA; Kirtane AJ; McLaurin BT; Solomon SL; Douglas JS; Popma JJ;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1208-18. PubMed ID: 20129547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year clinical outcomes of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent versus a permanent polymer paclitaxel-eluting stent: final results of the intracoronary stenting and angiographic restenosis - test equivalence between two drug-eluting stents (ISAR-TEST) trial.
King L; Byrne RA; Mehilli J; Schömig A; Kastrati A; Pache J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jan; 81(1):E23-8. PubMed ID: 22431239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials.
Doi H; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Yu A; Wang H; Mandinov L; Popma JJ; Ellis SG; Grube E; Dawkins KD; Weissman NJ; Turco MA; Ormiston JA; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1269-75. PubMed ID: 20129555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. One-year results of the CRISTAL Trial, a randomized comparison of cypher sirolimus-eluting coronary stents versus balloon angioplasty for restenosis of drug-eluting stents.
Chevalier B; Moulichon R; Teiger E; Brunel P; Metzger JP; Pansieri M; Carrie D; Stoll HP; Wittebols K; Spaulding C; Fajadet J;
J Interv Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 25(6):586-95. PubMed ID: 22994863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of six-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents to bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis of the RESEARCH (rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) and T-SEARCH (taxus stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital) registries.
Simsek C; Magro M; Boersma E; Onuma Y; Nauta S; Daemen J; Gaspersz M; van Geuns RJ; van der Giessen W; van Domburg R; Serruys P
J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 23(8):336-41. PubMed ID: 21828397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).
Gada H; Kirtane AJ; Newman W; Sanz M; Hermiller JB; Mahaffey KW; Cutlip DE; Sudhir K; Hou L; Koo K; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1263-6. PubMed ID: 24239202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term safety and efficacy with paclitaxel-eluting stents: 5-year final results of the TAXUS IV clinical trial (TAXUS IV-SR: Treatment of De Novo Coronary Disease Using a Single Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent).
Ellis SG; Stone GW; Cox DA; Hermiller J; O'Shaughnessy C; Mann T; Turco M; Caputo R; Bergin PJ; Bowman TS; Baim DS;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1248-59. PubMed ID: 20129552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The SPIRIT V diabetic study: a randomized clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent vs the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent in diabetic patients with de novo coronary artery lesions.
Grube E; Chevalier B; Guagliumi G; Smits PC; Stuteville M; Dorange C; Papeleu P; Kaul U; Džavík V
Am Heart J; 2012 May; 163(5):867-875.e1. PubMed ID: 22607866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Propensity score matched lesion-based comparison of long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes after placement of sirolimus (Cypher Bx Velocity) and paclitaxel (TAXUS Express)-eluting stents for de novo native coronary stenosis.
Nakano Y; Ishikawa T; Hino S; Mutoh M
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2014 Apr; 29(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 24122399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved late clinical safety with zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions: 3-year follow-up from the ENDEAVOR IV (Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease) trial.
Leon MB; Nikolsky E; Cutlip DE; Mauri L; Liberman H; Wilson H; Patterson J; Moses J; Kandzari DE;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1043-50. PubMed ID: 20965463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The unrestricted use of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents results in better clinical outcomes during 6-year follow-up than bare-metal stents: an analysis of the RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) registries.
Simsek C; Magro M; Boersma E; Onuma Y; Nauta ST; Gaspersz MP; van der Giessen WJ; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1051-8. PubMed ID: 20965464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcome of the unrestricted use of everolimus-eluting stents compared to sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients: the Bern-Rotterdam diabetes cohort study.
Simsek C; Räber L; Magro M; Boersma E; Onuma Y; Stefanini GG; Zanchin T; Kalesan B; Wenaweser P; Jüni P; van Geuns RJ; van Domburg RT; Windecker S; Serruys PW
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 170(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 24196314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Korean Multicentre Endeavor (KOMER) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) trial.
Kang WC; Ahn T; Lee K; Han SH; Shin EK; Jeong MH; Yoon JH; Park JS; Bae JH; Hur SH; Rha SW; Oh SK; Kim DI; Jang Y; Choi JW; Kim BO
EuroIntervention; 2011 Dec; 7(8):936-43. PubMed ID: 21959255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.
Claessen BE; Smits PC; Kereiakes DJ; Parise H; Fahy M; Kedhi E; Serruys PW; Lansky AJ; Cristea E; Sudhir K; Sood P; Simonton CA; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 4(11):1209-15. PubMed ID: 22115661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized trial of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stents: the ISAR-DESIRE 2 (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stents for In-Stent Restenosis 2) study.
Mehilli J; Byrne RA; Tiroch K; Pinieck S; Schulz S; Kufner S; Massberg S; Laugwitz KL; Schömig A; Kastrati A;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 55(24):2710-6. PubMed ID: 20226618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the SPIRIT II trial.
Onuma Y; Miquel-Hebert K; Serruys PW;
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jan; 8(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 23339811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Late-term clinical outcomes with zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. 5-year follow-up of the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
Kandzari DE; Mauri L; Popma JJ; Turco MA; Gurbel PA; Fitzgerald PJ; Leon MB
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 4(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 21596327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
