These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23518401)
21. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli. Shafiro V Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise. Galbrun L; Ali TT J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measurement of the binaural auditory filter using a detection task. Kolarik AJ; Culling JF J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3009-17. PubMed ID: 21117750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Binaural masking level difference in skilled reading children and children with dyslexia. Putter-Katz H; Feldman I; Hildesheimer M J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 22(3):59-63. PubMed ID: 22865426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise. Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds. Gregg MK; Samuel AG J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):974-91. PubMed ID: 18665739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age-related changes in the use of regular patterns for auditory scene analysis. Rimmele J; Schröger E; Bendixen A Hear Res; 2012 Jul; 289(1-2):98-107. PubMed ID: 22543088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Selective listening of concurrent auditory stimuli: an event-related potential study. Rao A; Zhang Y; Miller S Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):123-32. PubMed ID: 20595021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of auditory selective attention: why children struggle to hear in noisy environments. Jones PR; Moore DR; Amitay S Dev Psychol; 2015 Mar; 51(3):353-69. PubMed ID: 25706591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners. Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise. Sommers MS; Gehr SE Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Release from masking of low-frequency complex tones by high-frequency complex tone cue bands. Josupeit A; Hohmann V; van de Par S J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):EL450-5. PubMed ID: 23231207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech. Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Informational masking of complex tones in dyslexic children. Calcus A; Colin C; Deltenre P; Kolinsky R Neurosci Lett; 2015 Jan; 584():71-6. PubMed ID: 25459281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Speech recognition abilities in noise for children with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing impairment. Ruscetta MN; Arjmand EM; Pratt SR Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 15885329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm. Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise. Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]