These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2351888)
1. Effect of unilateral spinal adjustments on goniometrically assessed cervical lateral-flexion end-range asymmetries in otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Nilsson N J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 May; 13(4):237. PubMed ID: 2351888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of unilateral spinal adjustments on goniometrically-assessed cervical lateral-flexion end-range asymmetries in otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Nansel DD; Cremata E; Carlson J; Szlazak M J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Dec; 12(6):419-27. PubMed ID: 2486560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of unilateral spinal adjustments on goniometrically-assessed cervical lateral-flexion end-range asymmetries in otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Nilsson N J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990; 13(6):348-9. PubMed ID: 2394952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of unilateral spinal adjustments on goniometrically-assessed cervical lateral-flexion end-range asymmetries in otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Williamson S J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990 Sep; 13(7):418. PubMed ID: 2212888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of cervical adjustments on lateral-flexion passive end-range asymmetry and on blood pressure, heart rate and plasma catecholamine levels. Nansel D; Jansen R; Cremata E; Dhami MS; Holley D J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1991 Oct; 14(8):450-6. PubMed ID: 1940682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of upper versus lower cervical adjustments with respect to the amelioration of passive rotational versus lateral-flexion end-range asymmetries in otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Nansel DD; Peneff A; Quitoriano J J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Feb; 15(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 1564415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time course considerations for the effects of unilateral lower cervical adjustments with respect to the amelioration of cervical lateral-flexion passive end-range asymmetry. Nansel D; Peneff A; Cremata E; Carlson J J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990; 13(6):297-304. PubMed ID: 2394946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons between active vs. passive end-range assessments in subjects exhibiting cervical range of motion asymmetries. Wong A; Nansel DD J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992; 15(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 1573344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design. Christensen HW; Nilsson N J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 9726064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in neck mobility and pressure pain threshold levels following a cervical myofascial induction technique in pain-free healthy subjects. Saíz-Llamosas JR; Fernández-Pérez AM; Fajardo-Rodríguez MF; Pilat A; Valenza-Demet G; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Jun; 32(5):352-7. PubMed ID: 19539117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lasting changes in passive range motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial. Nilsson N; Christensen HW; Hartvigsen J J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996; 19(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 8728459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interexaminer concordance in detecting joint-play asymmetries in the cervical spines of otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Nansel DD; Peneff AL; Jansen RD; Cooperstein R J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Dec; 12(6):428-33. PubMed ID: 2628521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A normal sagittal spinal configuration: a desirable clinical outcome. Cooperstein R J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Feb; 20(2):136-7; author reply 137-9. PubMed ID: 9046464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Optoelectric measurement of changes in leg length inequality resulting from isolation tests. De Witt JK; Osterbauer PJ; Stelmach GE; Fuhr AW J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Oct; 17(8):530-8. PubMed ID: 7836876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interexaminer concordance in detecting joint-play asymmetries in the cervical spines of otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Haas M; Nyiendo J J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1990; 13(6):346-8. PubMed ID: 2264867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in neck pain and active range of motion after a single thoracic spine manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a case series. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C; Palomeque-del-Cerro L; Rodríguez-Blanco C; Gómez-Conesa A; Miangolarra-Page JC J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 May; 30(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 17509440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old. Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cervical manikin procedure for chiropractic skills development. Young TJ; Hayek R; Philipson SA J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 May; 21(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 9608379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multivariate time-series descriptive case study of chiropractic care in the treatment of cervical pain. Lowden TA; Keating JC; Meeker WC J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1986 Dec; 9(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 3805914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]